Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 13 July 2022 02:05 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404CBC157B51 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.859
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.859 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=lZFTttfs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=hBAZXJTQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkfXtltOllIc for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6335C14F73B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:05:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71677 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2022 02:05:46 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=117fb.62ce287a.k2207; bh=Q8/xEziSTFOdZXKhWIsK4ooDLw4za9oXUWzPmnx38Kc=; b=lZFTttfsi1Xscq6OrMwEaZCJt9s3MITZL+V5TbuOex9y9/FrhMIRcBOk/Xu/eDuvULk7vBx4eFbASwowxPjLgP1xFzXccQBRPZgnkm0Dzw+KxH9TDBxQZ1Kt/KEP18YclP66kGEmZBGYBfSBI6HD0G72iIGlctG9XKL5MKxb3AydAjDBFCBCetXmOFdPRqa438n2xOKtGBR8U1WswZvoYhz5q+PEeHfiH653onF3W4+LHDDtuEQ/JDcYmVn08IpM9ErkpG3pWZr0FCPr6j6kizdwhpu4Q5DhI5JEt5MQYKRP0rAID2JCgS00+Btz6ONIHYMkbbwUVrXck2j9NO8zQg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=117fb.62ce287a.k2207; bh=Q8/xEziSTFOdZXKhWIsK4ooDLw4za9oXUWzPmnx38Kc=; b=hBAZXJTQ0PFX/4gJf8PhQfG2t845xQyiLqneq3dEDL4XhvxU7DJ4/cCmo3pADrf/xqUtFhwMOuAq6XYnr4EJy4Qvmn9XXRY3uJ+3TR6/hBW47SV5pgi6/7j0OuNTg/KfStdtTU+aDq5EbKSVFnGwkvHxQtPKwWFexDl5tvwfnEYrN46PgdkPv0+KaSxj/5hVvI/mG7LEs6dvFyDZkQxm9ZcX2tQ1lHZFqEvUZSSQnJNfd2l6qeLSzqRxMJMXsZ3rE3yeSG4gGNrwCVqWOZU7lLOPVviI54Z7B1eVFwE6eHPpefMz+9ogsRr9P6rJrAPVidqZR2BTMJfHqHTHV/zXYQ==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 13 Jul 2022 02:05:45 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7FFC345927B0; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:05:45 -0400
Message-Id: <20220713020545.7FFC345927B0@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: todd.herr@valimail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAHej_8nkpGo30b9-ZkRc_wokymJ2ry_hsMgzaB2m4EH-WWG_zw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/oCsnQ0a7OEdfyal_CvEOayxTIEM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:05:54 -0000

It appears that Todd Herr  <todd.herr@valimail.com> said:
>On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 1:30 PM Douglas Foster <
>dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What problem does this tree walk solve?  Can anyone explain how this tree
>> walk improves on RFC7489 evaluation results?
>>
>>
>RFC 7489 acknowledged that its methods for discovering the organizational
>domain had shortcomings. ...

While I agree with everything you said, I really hope we can avoid
wasting time relitigating decisions we've already made.

R's,
John