Re: [dnsext] [spfbis] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

Dave,

As I pointed out to Paul Hoffman, the message I sent that I believe started this thread said:

"It is in keeping with past practice, e.g., see the notations for MD, MF, A6, and the MAILA RRtypes at http://www.iana.org/assignments/dns-parameters/dns-parameters.xml."

Regards,
-drc

On Apr 26, 2013, at 3:43 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 4/23/2013 3:03 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Section 13.1 of draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-14 obsoletes the SPF RRTYPE:
>> 
>>   'IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying
>>    "(OBSOLETE - use TXT)" in the DNS Parameters registry.'
>> 
>> Is the annotation in the DNS Parameters registry correct?
> 
> 
> Dear DNSEXT,
> 
> For all of the really interesting side discussions that have developed since SM sent this initial query, I believe there have not been any responses that answered the question that was asked.
> 
> DNSEXT was asked to provide expert review of this specific bit of text.  The text is intended to be comparable to the way that some other, similar situations have already been handled.
> 
> d/
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net
> _______________________________________________
> dnsext mailing list
> dnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext