IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Thu, 25 April 2013 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B539321F960F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8883QMkGmAJu for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:21:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C68C21F9606 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-173.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r3PGLg31075703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:21:42 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077515C1B4@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:21:41 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F22F597-1FD0-4A79-BC18-C66E7FB4EFEE@vpnc.org>
References: <20130425013317.36729.qmail@joyce.lan> <80ADB3EE-17FD-4628-B818-801CB71BCBFE@virtualized.org> <BB8C643A-FC46-4B2F-B677-F1B7CAB0E79F@frobbit.se> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304251030380.65043@joyce.lan> <14A728AE-83DC-4C1F-A88A-6F988D37F2C7@frobbit.se> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077515C1B4@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org Group" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] Obsoleting SPF RRTYPE
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:21:54 -0000

On Apr 25, 2013, at 9:01 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> On Apr 25, 2013, at 11:03 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:
>> They know how i feel. We in IETF do believe in rough consensus. I am this time on the rough side.
> 
> It seems to be the case that there are rather a lot of people on the dnsext mailing list who are on the rough side of the consensus here.   That suggests that perhaps the consensus isn't in the direction that we are presuming it is.

Are you saying that the people on the DNSEXT mailing list read the document that is in WG LC in the other WG? If so, please re-read the comments above. It is pretty clear most did not. Helping form consensus means more than voicing an uninformed reaction on an unrelated mailing list: it takes work and concern for everybody else who is doing work.

--Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email