IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 08 October 2015 18:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EB31B2D19 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xmt9psVVQtDL for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [50.116.54.116]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2735D1B2D03 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:08:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5301F1073D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:08:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03OLDTM19b2K for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:08:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (c-73-142-68-92.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.142.68.92]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09C811072E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 18:08:19 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 14:08:17 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151008180817.GM17602@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com> <C4FA9FA6-76E3-4FF3-862B-C5C0DF75C761@kirei.se> <D1C15986-603E-4932-B551-0497638D9849@vpnc.org> <02869F43-87A4-4797-8FD3-276C02DF665D@kirei.se> <EEA946B1-8BF3-4AB7-99D2-4C8CDCCF0EC0@vpnc.org> <20151008164015.GJ17602@mx2.yitter.info> <4BC462D4-F6B9-4AB1-A021-234218072562@virtualized.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4BC462D4-F6B9-4AB1-A021-234218072562@virtualized.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/1iTSUGMHY4c4FXcrTyhVr9z3vu4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:08:24 -0000

On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:06:47AM -0700, David Conrad wrote:
> 
> What am I missing?

>From my POV, nothing.  Paul seemed to be suggesting that the current
arrangements should be published somehow other than as "an IETF
document".  Maybe he meant "send it up the Independent Submissions
editor with ICANN staff on the top".  I don't really know.

If that is what he meant, then I think the distinction is not that
interesting.  IME nobody except a tiny fraction of IETF participants
makes the ISE/IETF product distinction. 

If it's not what he meant, then I see no value in creating a new
publication path.

IMO, what is current practice, whatever it is, ought to be in the
document.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email