IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 08 October 2015 16:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8191A914A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:40:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id avCiduKSGZQN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (mx2.yitter.info [IPv6:2600:3c03::f03c:91ff:fedf:cfab]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D93DD1A9140 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3005B10739 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:40:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx2.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx2.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DX4zcKFITVLg for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx2.yitter.info (c-73-142-68-92.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.142.68.92]) by mx2.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2686310662 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 16:40:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:40:15 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20151008164015.GJ17602@mx2.yitter.info>
References: <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net> <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual> <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com> <C4FA9FA6-76E3-4FF3-862B-C5C0DF75C761@kirei.se> <D1C15986-603E-4932-B551-0497638D9849@vpnc.org> <02869F43-87A4-4797-8FD3-276C02DF665D@kirei.se> <EEA946B1-8BF3-4AB7-99D2-4C8CDCCF0EC0@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <EEA946B1-8BF3-4AB7-99D2-4C8CDCCF0EC0@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VXmT6-KJVBuqsUOJuz8clPS8-BA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:40:23 -0000

On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 09:39:06AM -0400, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Fully agree. That is why this should not be an IETF document, and instead it
> should be written and published by the organization that is responsible for
> the formats and publication methods.

I don't really care how this happens, but I note that both previously
and currently staff of that organization seem to use the RFC series to
publish technical specification documents.  Generally policy documents
don't get published as RFCs, but other documents do.

I am not too sure I see why it'd be helpful to create a completely new
publication mechanism for such specifications from ICANN.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email