IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com> Sun, 04 October 2015 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95F01B3499 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uibQfV-GzVlW for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9321B34AB for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qkcf65 with SMTP id f65so61986432qkc.3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hGFL4HzhgBnPUQVY7lHvlq6CZmVsLKttKIYKTAWDyfc=; b=orQWSPTDjaKiFaEKrdiSqTEkzk1ljvvQL7vlpQ7R44ErMheatO6re9Y5ueKAKgQI52 6Oks+eoDGCVQZsFJDy4tlYhc/3fyKxAg1ET8/DnBdwKoQWGORWfrrg5UjyxgGAckQgwE ASvBhssidgySEu/WHJzcaEvKLYVK4c2aEFkT/sRP3hGhsJV/h8fu1EyIbYJOHgLhRnGB qgYka+UcsHT6xWW6cbEj0P6SqJc44zXtvpu1NJA6zLaa8LdHSgC7vcQeE863TnYh6n+A vg39Y+ir0gTP0Qp8jv25VwT9ncSyY5zUOIT4JBZNvurXWsfgNpct84fWRxoo2+QmkaPS 9C+A==
X-Received: by 10.55.26.14 with SMTP id a14mr25304449qka.99.1443983750839; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.15] (c-24-63-89-87.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.63.89.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9sm9499997qka.49.2015.10.04.11.35.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8914DF4F-C361-44D7-8236-1F3ADCFA11B5@virtualized.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:35:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <20970EC6-AAD2-4030-AE9D-1FB1694170B0@gmail.com>
References: <20150928114202.823.19868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0E4AA958-7740-4602-A3CF-D2E481DBC15E@hopcount.ca> <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net> <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual> <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com> <8914DF4F-C361-44D7-8236-1F3ADCFA11B5@virtualized.org>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/kGTfvdIW3Ay9ScGbGuEyB783w4E>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:37:28 -0000

On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:31 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:

>> Your co-chair is a little confused.
> 
> Sorry about that.

No worries, it happens all the time….
> 
> On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:00 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
>>> I've since been told that the draft doesn't actually document current practice (don't know the details), so this probably needs to be fixed.
>> 
>> What "needs to be fixed"? That the draft doesn't document current practice?
> 
> Yes.  I received a comment in response to my "+1" that the draft differs from current practice. I haven't had time to pursue the details, but wanted to flag this to indicate my "+1" was premature. I believe the document should reflect current practice.

Agreed, and it suggests that adoption might indeed be the right next step if folks want to continue to work on it. We're happy to proceed as the authors and the WG prefer.


thanks,
Suzanne

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email