IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> Sun, 04 October 2015 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <drc@virtualized.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92A11B3485 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x208XZRTPcjN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f50.google.com (mail-pa0-f50.google.com [209.85.220.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C9AD1B3484 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so156794034pac.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=PNPuJ8IOAxQ7ujs59EZ5hjwdHq1WHXuVs3SuwO3WtxY=; b=dL32xik1WmfQlXM4e9Y2IgECanJpjIOntaacGNWbaDhFBzGo8FFAxyZI/m3EGXO7r/ IDnlmlrYWtxKti8dBT5nSir71ycJJ4vjXz2oRYRje7LcD1xxYm6e+7nEIBgNbr8SvXLh 2JEmXoWX73Hd1Tk7m2d3OF0Qs9icIqbQ72pIjRI3z3g6/N8QMiIuWOjxsUrBAg1pg87h EJFA0gcFZ2513LF8Jv0dSh830pS/h8x4xZwCRJmb1MGRXRJjnnQI2TP46xUf29BAai7L Jn3/+Le1ZC68VG5DW9TNbMV7sHoqnmzUtVetHd3i/kREMgVHg7ZVyzhNGeqWXoPE5x4r +1vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnmcn98OQYG0IpmBPKaoNHQ0+f9FZswz+VbVB45ElhcqnMr5/NhGW+Y/gykirP1OKnvUveJ
X-Received: by 10.66.139.70 with SMTP id qw6mr29030387pab.142.1443983469863; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4300:6ed2:3e15:c2ff:fede:9b90? ([2601:647:4300:6ed2:3e15:c2ff:fede:9b90]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qp5sm23151164pbc.43.2015.10.04.11.31.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9FF56489-A0CC-45AC-880A-800A31462144"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
In-Reply-To: <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 11:31:04 -0700
Message-Id: <8914DF4F-C361-44D7-8236-1F3ADCFA11B5@virtualized.org>
References: <20150928114202.823.19868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0E4AA958-7740-4602-A3CF-D2E481DBC15E@hopcount.ca> <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net> <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual> <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com>
To: Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/zIq9dzu-aVwQKnXYG0vOmXl5c9c>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:31:12 -0000

> Your co-chair is a little confused.

Sorry about that.

On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:00 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
>> I've since been told that the draft doesn't actually document current practice (don't know the details), so this probably needs to be fixed.
> 
> What "needs to be fixed"? That the draft doesn't document current practice?

Yes.  I received a comment in response to my "+1" that the draft differs from current practice. I haven't had time to pursue the details, but wanted to flag this to indicate my "+1" was premature. I believe the document should reflect current practice.

Regards,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email