Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Mon, 05 October 2015 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84191A1B6E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:50:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.431
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.431 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EoAwNgCSsK0c for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-1.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA4D1A87D9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:50:21 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1044.021; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:50:21 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHQ+uOu45Is3bnnhkCMbqndkHLca55Y2ToAgANDioCAAAdjgIABNFYAgAAE+gCAAAaUgIAAAZqA///ysYA=
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:50:21 +0000
Message-ID: <D2381F51.FB2D%edward.lewis@icann.org>
References: <20150928114202.823.19868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0E4AA958-7740-4602-A3CF-D2E481DBC15E@hopcount.ca> <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net> <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual> <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com> <C4FA9FA6-76E3-4FF3-862B-C5C0DF75C761@kirei.se> <D1C15986-603E-4932-B551-0497638D9849@vpnc.org> <02869F43-87A4-4797-8FD3-276C02DF665D@kirei.se> <74608AF4-95FA-427B-B03E-DEBBE5C9BF18@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <74608AF4-95FA-427B-B03E-DEBBE5C9BF18@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.5.150821
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.44.1]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3526894217_212700"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/m4bA7XOpXwD5j01b2ypxAeccQm4>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:50:24 -0000

On 10/5/15, 9:37, "DNSOP on behalf of Tim Wicinski"
<dnsop-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:


>Could ICANN not document what they do now ?

In there world of "there's so many things to do" - a few weeks back,
off-list, there was a start of a discussion to alter the list of editors
(namely, add me) of the draft.

Aside - if I recall correctly, years ago, Joe announced the -00 as "what
ICANN does" not something up for debate but something that would be ideal
if the IETF had some comment on. (The new-fangled IETF archives don't seem
to have an obvious way to look at messages from September 2010 or October
2010 when I suspect the mail triggering this idea arrived.  If anyone
knows where the old-hangled mailman archives are, it would be helpful.)

I see this -11 document as something that can be an RFC, not a WG product.
 I.e., an individual submission with advice from the WG.  The intent is to
have an immutable, reviewed technical document published for the technical
community.  The RFC series seems appropriate.

I could be wrong.

My offer to be added as an editor was to take on any edits that might be
needed.  I don't know (off the top of my head) if any are.  Perhaps it
would be more useful to have a document shepherd than an editor to get
this -11 into an RFC.