IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> Tue, 29 September 2015 09:53 UTC

Return-Path: <shane@time-travellers.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D112E1A6F9A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pip386Y2QRUv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time-travellers.nl.eu.org (c.time-travellers.nl.eu.org [IPv6:2a02:2770::21a:4aff:fea3:eeaa]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91741A6F90 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 143-245-128-083.dynamic.caiway.nl ([83.128.245.143] helo=casual) by time-travellers.nl.eu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <shane@time-travellers.org>) id 1Zgran-0004ib-Nj; Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:02 +0000
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:01 +0000
From: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
To: Andras Salamon <andras@dns.net>
Message-ID: <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual>
In-Reply-To: <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net>
References: <20150928114202.823.19868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0E4AA958-7740-4602-A3CF-D2E481DBC15E@hopcount.ca> <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/LaTuJXE-pUMTGQV6CWbreprJXgE>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 09:53:06 -0000

All,

On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:53:25 +0100
Andras Salamon <andras@dns.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:59:00AM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> >This document describes existing practice, and provides guidance for 
> >people who need to bootstrap a validator using the mechanisms provided 
> >by ICANN back in 2009/2010 when the root zone was first published.
> 
> Preempting a WGLC, I support the document.  It states its aim of
> documenting existing practices, and it does so clearly.

I agree completely. I am actually confused as to why it is not already
an RFC.

Cheers,

--
Shane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email