IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 05 October 2015 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D19E1ACD7E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qh7Qhfg6ENIq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8770E1ACD70 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 06:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by qgev79 with SMTP id v79so149042014qge.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=tBuLcWfXdm7QgtJcoqqjLKHvUbEZ7paa1cHEmKb7/pk=; b=RRD294Sgx4mmqHfS4BNYWnKY1H9ymBFVpt3JJcGDymAON0gyiYJpZHFxT1GXtZEGkE 7earOm5+TQGVo3B71PSLTXapgRaIc95jVcBqCnfChRowxasVCWWZnVwhLJEbl2NV8fju QmB41XLice8daGM2geQmoX8e0Lk7H4ecuw5MYjMx/qf9Jlu5cRBybD0SrwpFRiw4K54b jy/vOyN4fL97trx+4e4/spIV2SNemwipGq9+OYNaw+exvbCQhJWWvT/ndqLO/hzHgAz8 3tjaTYSYnEH3XjmPA2Ne/rYsoAIXN6GCT/BRHR3maFb9YnsxTNPZgCIDtBIyxZ9/z3zS Hsyw==
X-Received: by 10.140.150.4 with SMTP id 4mr39555459qhw.35.1444052277691; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:37:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.100.30.153] ([207.96.196.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b73sm11365597qka.14.2015.10.05.06.37.56 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 06:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13A452)
In-Reply-To: <02869F43-87A4-4797-8FD3-276C02DF665D@kirei.se>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 09:37:55 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <74608AF4-95FA-427B-B03E-DEBBE5C9BF18@gmail.com>
References: <20150928114202.823.19868.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0E4AA958-7740-4602-A3CF-D2E481DBC15E@hopcount.ca> <20150928155325.GA63874@gaon.net> <20150929095301.32c3e6a3@casual> <13F1D87F-1C07-40EB-86B0-564C4109C9B0@virtualized.org> <1973252D-924F-4EF1-A38F-5EC01AD331F6@gmail.com> <FDD04DCC-59C5-41F5-8CAF-1EF31CD65A34@virtualized.org> <63E1E01E-C172-4A0F-B434-F796546BB657@gmail.com> <C4FA9FA6-76E3-4FF3-862B-C5C0DF75C761@kirei.se> <D1C15986-603E-4932-B551-0497638D9849@vpnc.org> <02869F43-87A4-4797-8FD3-276C02DF665D@kirei.se>
To: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/BGjLKt_eiZG5vsx-YWaYE2O9BPA>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Expiration impending: <draft-jabley-dnssec-trust-anchor-11.txt>
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:38:00 -0000



From my high tech gadget

> On Oct 5, 2015, at 09:32, Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se> wrote:
> 
> Although I agree with that, I still find it useful to publish this draft as document how things are done today. If the world did not use the published trust anchors as designed, that is (to some extent) failure. Still, it documents (or apparently tries to) the plan as it were back in 2010.

My opinion (and mine alone here) is if this document does not describe current behavior it should not go out. 

Could ICANN not document what they do now ? 

Also the IAB just updated their root server requirements RFC, 2870. 

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email