Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation-00.txt

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 22 November 2023 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DD4C1516E1 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:06:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4FAgGckTiE3 for <gendispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAC0FC15154A for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-da0cfcb9f40so161374276.2 for <gendispatch@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1700683558; x=1701288358; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jH6MeEbvhEL8IgzKcSV5JRLIy1HoZsI8+G7nAuC8ra0=; b=RyOFXuU4vx5b2UrLaD000ezHHr7fWxmfJcAKgL3VOgR40wCMHC0VawrWtJ3E/nv+OB Yi4H/KhJnq1dv6vxMj20nACtluYfkAlr0grXy3zpE9XeVZ3NoV7OAb7rei08iV4CCTKe qSOjXxTpYOC6DnBdPe/eBdktTmLpqwQUCkwJXaC2xyfPDyewNqfcMWCRe6w1rnjG4/Uw YV6Yqd8mBwlRRUk1xFx9BWels7Dar3CmARk0DXWApn4yrSfHQa79ZXBc+4WVd/ww+TjI AlV+P4/GY2gJ7x2c1RDQjgXFSKVNQ6FKbeQFszkfAODwu00qPS4zDYel0HNZipldIogp I22g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1700683558; x=1701288358; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jH6MeEbvhEL8IgzKcSV5JRLIy1HoZsI8+G7nAuC8ra0=; b=aJjqZ+IuKdrQHsin24veReADa8fFd5tpBOnrsBJo8qStHzErCIcckG1fir/OEWec2N nSpUau0GHuTZhgbniuEKMprwgVGYCzuwXtqGlHce3bIQMfHkAtQSPNdLBFzeVaGAkNWC aDba5Mdk+i277//YBKeowoOdrHqu9PUTQwXdLg9XqX0dYzkbiblIJ15CbjA+O4bxq5oX Tdoj024Oc6IzXJaAbpigSb90cmeC3vv25WPk97w3g/1qJdx9uf6+bbTupeA1G0lfnEn6 TPCe+hLdL1uaUm7f4SWHkdr2ZeJLdM0Fis0CIkgTkICEayTtXxbrWvZd/J7PPZteHkVf kMeg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxIYOBFIofqRY2j4YFQWdZaGLad7+6qE80c1DRtw21kd9rWKps/ 8zj4esJ+tcer57+6I6csGgK2vFKwI/Hap9lpP3GAAv2bVtQLuFn1
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGrlcXlNkLRt0Dg3pREgTYuoTB/L2+8rLUjiEiQ+vD2k5MpdlW++u1bJS9HKp2Ad87uSQCCKTt1QVNNVdl1zHc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d846:0:b0:d9a:ccdf:3873 with SMTP id p67-20020a25d846000000b00d9accdf3873mr3469693ybg.48.1700683558376; Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <55d7f614-2fd7-4d67-9102-aa45f8a62040@betaapp.fastmail.com> <09790854-FBD8-4566-BE1D-03836FDB60F6@huitema.net>
In-Reply-To: <09790854-FBD8-4566-BE1D-03836FDB60F6@huitema.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 12:05:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBOO5_Dvf8Lvw=TqXO1jhUy1vXAAJZ+YkZijQAp6J5Pzqg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Cc: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>, Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>, gendispatch@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005f6b92060ac33ffe"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gendispatch/khYx-l-_CYNp9ou3wgc_9MUpu5Y>
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] New Version Notification for draft-knodel-nomcom-gender-representation-00.txt
X-BeenThere: gendispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: General Area Dispatch <gendispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gendispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:gendispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gendispatch>, <mailto:gendispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 20:06:00 -0000

On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:57 AM Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

>
> > On Nov 21, 2023, at 8:37 PM, Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023, at 15:25, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >> Yes, but if (hypothetically) we had four possible responses: Male,
> >> Female, Other, Prefer-not-to-say,
> >> I really don't know what to do with Prefer-not-to-say.
> >
> > I have no strong preference here, but it could be reasonable to treat
> other and pnts as distinct categories.  Or both together.  Based on my
> understanding of demographics, it is unlikely that either (or both) would
> be selected for more than 8 or 9 out of 10, so while we need to write up
> firm rules, that would be the only reason we'd need that level of
> precision; it's unlikely to be a problem in practice.
>
> Prefer-not-to-say amounts to opting out of gender based selection. That
> means the candidate would be selected based on random ranking only, and
> should never be selected based on "reserved for minority" preferences.
>
> There are many reasons to prefer not to say anything. One is a general
> aversion for keeping personal preferences in databases, based for example
> of the history of repurposing such databases for other purposes, like the
> Gestapo did 60 some years ago. Another is because the participant would
> prefer to keep private details hidden. Yet anther is to introduce enough
> noise in the system to provide cover for those participants who want their
> private details hidden. These are all very good reasons, but they should
> not provide any priority in nomcom selection.
>

Just so I understand what you are proposing in practice. Suppose we have
four
values: A, B, C, and PNTS, then the selection algorithm would be:

exclude = None
while selected_total < 10 {
  candidate = draw_random()
  if selected(gender(x)) == 8 {
     exclude = gender(x)
  }
  if exclude != None {
    if exclude == gender(x)  {
       skip;
    }
    // This avoids giving pnts a preference
    if gender(x) == pnts {
       skip;
    }

   select x;
}

-Ekr






-Ekr