Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Kathleen: 

I have written a draft suggesting a template for the I2RS YANG modules which are designed to exist in the I2RS Ephemeral Control Plane data store (configuration and operational state).    

Draft location: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2rs-yang-sec-consider/

I would appreciate an email discussion with the security ADs, OPS/NM ADs, and Routing AD (Alia Atlas).  I agree that this I2RS YANG data model (L3) and the base I2RS topology model should both provide updated YANG Security Considerations sections. I would appreciate if Benoit or you hold a discuss until we sort out these issues. 

Thank you, 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:44 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Alissa's comment that the YANG module security consideration section guidelines need to be followed and this shouldn't go forward until that is corrected.  I'm told it will be, thanks.