Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Juergen: 

Per my earlier answer to Martin, No.   Most topology live in the same
ephemeral space as the I2RS Topology drafts.   Whether it is ephemeral state
in configuration data store or ephemeral state for the Control Plane data
store - the topology models seem (AFAIK) to be the same type of information.


Cheerily, Sue   

-----Original Message-----
From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 11:26 AM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: 'Martin Bjorklund'; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 09:41:15AM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
> 
> .         If you ask if the pre-standardization I2RS Yang Topology models
> (basic and L3)  implemented are part of the configuration data store, 
> the answer is yes - AFAIK.
> 
> .         If you ask if the WG LC Topology models are approved to be part
of
> the configuration data store, my understanding was no.   I2RS WG was to
> abide by the decision of NETMOD WG on which data store I2RS modules 
> were placed in.
>

So you are saying we have to redo topology models elsewhere in order to have
some that can be implemented and used outside an I2RS system?

If so, this is probably important for Benoit to understand.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>