Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 11:47 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2F212958A; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 03:47:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.945
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.945 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HQkMxvYhL3nM; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 03:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0513712956B; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 03:47:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=70.194.1.59;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: 'Juergen Schoenwaelder' <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
References: <000701d27594$28d12350$7a7369f0$@ndzh.com> <20170123.194721.1193117831378217486.mbj@tail-f.com> <010a01d275b0$183d7360$48b85a20$@ndzh.com> <20170123.212621.119545616051737472.mbj@tail-f.com> <afdfb4d3-0901-2ee0-8d87-f8f1aeeff37e@hq.sk> <019c01d275c4$edf51f30$c9df5d90$@ndzh.com> <20170123221458.GA34192@elstar.local>
In-Reply-To: <20170123221458.GA34192@elstar.local>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 06:42:30 -0500
Message-ID: <029301d27636$f2514690$d6f3d3b0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGvtLYzrkxhP8mTK1eafm2axwyjOwK6rYpQAgVFSKQCceLYywFHvL5+Afu0CsQBDML0aaEwHmfg
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/wVWtem7-G2T93APN2zAhQ_zSKAw>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, 'Martin Bjorklund' <mbj@tail-f.com>, draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org, i2rs-chairs@ietf.org, 'Robert Varga' <nite@hq.sk>, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 11:47:21 -0000

Juergen: 

Yep.  That's the charter.  draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-10.txt is a
generic topology model.  draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08.txt is a
generic topology for L3 unicast.   These support topology extension for
non-I2RS user.  We met the milestone and deliver the YANG Modules to the
IESG.    We discussed the "write" feature during WG LC and in the WG.   We
passed this by AD Benoit Claise who agreed to the reasons present by the
draft authors.  

Kinda' missed your comments in the normal comment period (WG LC, IETF LC). 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 5:15 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; 'Martin Bjorklund';
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org; i2rs-chairs@ietf.org; 'Robert
Varga'; Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com; iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

Perhaps just adding to the confusion, here is what the WG charter
says:

    o The ability to extract information about topology from the network.
      Injection and creation of topology will not be considered as a work
      item. Such topology-related models will be based on a generic
      topology model to support multiple uses; the generic topology model
      should support topology extension for non-I2RS uses.

And as a milestone:

  Dec 2016 - Request Publication of Protocol Independent Topology Data
Models

/js

On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 05:06:04PM -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
> Robert and Martin: 
> 
> I agree with Robert that the current implementations of the ODL 
> topology models are handled as part of the configuration data store with
ephemeral
> state.   I will point out that these implementation are pre-standards
> implementations of the I2RS YANG Data model.  
> 
> While standardizing the topology data models, the I2RS WG have been 
> asked to align with the draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-00.txt 
> NETMOD WG document.  This NETMOD WG document moves the I2RS ephemeral data
store from
> configuration data store to a Control Plane data store.   If we follow
this
> draft, the I2RS Topology models are part of the I2RS ephemeral data store.
> If you disagree with the placement of the Topology data models, please 
> indicate this to the NETMOD WG and to Benoit.  Could you propose a way 
> that you would see the ephemeral state working with the configuration data
store
> to the NETMOD WG?   
> 
> Quite frankly, I feel a bit of whip-lash on this topic.   NETMOD WG asks
for
> Control Plane Data store.  You ask for configuration data store (which was
> the I2RS initial proposal).   It is possible for either one to work for
I2RS
> Topology models - if the right details are taken care of.   How do we make
> progress on choosing one method so we can write the I2RS Topology 
> Models security considerations.?
> 
> Sue
>   
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Varga [mailto:nite@hq.sk]
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 4:11 PM
> To: Martin Bjorklund; shares@ndzh.com
> Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org;
> j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de; i2rs-chairs@ietf.org; 
> Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com; iesg@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
> 
> On 01/23/2017 09:26 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> >> I'm pulling your questions to the top of this email. 
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> Question 1: Ok.  Just to make sure I understand this correctly - 
> >> these topology models are intended to be I2RS-specific, and they 
> >> cannot be used for any other purpose.  If anyone needs a general 
> >> topology model outside of the I2RS protocol, they will have to 
> >> design their own model.  Is this correct?
> >>
> >>  
> >>
> >> Response 1:  Not really.  
> > Ok, so are you saying that the models are in fact generic, and can 
> > be used outside of I2RS?  I.e., they *can* be used with the normal 
> > configuration datastores?
> > 
> 
> From implementation experience, yes, they can be used for storing 
> configuration. OpenDaylight uses (an ancient predecessor of) 
> yang-network-topo to store configure details about devices in its 
> managed networks.
> 
> Regards,
> Robert
> 
> 

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs