IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 24 January 2017 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE1B1296BE for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:02:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lucidvision.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4SVYITCfOnsf for <i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:02:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidab1.miniserver.com [78.31.106.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB7D1296C9 for <i2rs@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jan 2017 12:02:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucidvision.com; s=default; t=1485288059; bh=uI9N5AjWEuTVMHRKQoLhHvBfMq7AtLPv4TH1ti7IlPs=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=lSnJ8knFLCro7C1yZ/ns+C5Sqv2OnT7nTQfofxbJLnKMccrMqoasBr4SZ1nQ0qsSc hAbjB/jsYbYSBuk5AvmxiSCDT5WQL9tTFSiRkvvI8whpLlSY6ofiJt1643ANafP0nX c+gY1vAG8ed2CIBprTe8nA19OyG2Tdp2fYlmMb1o=
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.255.148.181;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Thomas Nadeau <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <008d01d2766a$5387def0$fa979cd0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 15:01:49 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A14208D-2046-4421-AD8A-B8D3CED74D36@lucidvision.com>
References: <000701d27594$28d12350$7a7369f0$@ndzh.com> <20170123.194721.1193117831378217486.mbj@tail-f.com> <010a01d275b0$183d7360$48b85a20$@ndzh.com> <20170123.212621.119545616051737472.mbj@tail-f.com> <afdfb4d3-0901-2ee0-8d87-f8f1aeeff37e@hq.sk> <019c01d275c4$edf51f30$c9df5d90$@ndzh.com> <20170123221458.GA34192@elstar.local> <029301d27636$f2514690$d6f3d3b0$@ndzh.com> <20170124115221.GD35835@elstar.local> <87f80f69-5a3c-18a0-8f4f-e560572417e8@kot-begemot.co.uk> <008d01d2766a$5387def0$fa979cd0$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Authenticated-User: tnadeau@lucidvision.com
X-Info: aspam skipped due to (g_smite_skip_relay)
X-Encryption: SSL encrypted
X-MyRbl: Color=Yellow Age=0 Spam=0 Notspam=2 Stars=0 Good=0 Friend=2 Surbl=0 Catch=0 r=0 ip=50.255.148.181
X-IP-stats: Notspam Incoming Last 0, First 620, in=4705, out=0, spam=0 Known=true ip=50.255.148.181
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/ha92Oc5BjI6HaVvlmGCXkYGsrOs>
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org, Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@kot-begemot.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:02:16 -0000

	Sue: 

	The implication of that statement is that actual implementations (like ODL etc) now 
need to copy/paste this model without the I2RS text to use them in other ways. This seems
strange and just about the most inefficient way to use these that I can think of.

	—Tom



> On Jan 24, 2017:12:50 PM, at 12:50 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Anton:  
> 
> See earlier message to Martin.  Topology models are I2RS YANG Models
> designed for ephemeral state with specific security concerns.  This is not
> your basic YANG model no matter which data store ephemeral gets linked to.
> Where is ephemeral state?  By IESG Design of charter, I2RS is not in charge
> of defining ephemeral state solution.  NETMOD/NETCONF are.  Go ask them. 
> 
> Do not blame the messenger echoing NETMOD results, 
> 
> Sue 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anton Ivanov
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:30 AM
> To: i2rs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
> 
> On 24/01/17 11:52, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>> Susan,
>> 
>> so are these YANG models regular YANG models or are these YANG models 
>> specific to the yet to be defined I2RS protocol and yet to be defined 
>> datastores?
>> 
>> I think this is the core of Martin's and my question. A simple clear 
>> and concise answer would be nice.
> 
> +1.
> 
> A.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email