Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

Thank you for your comment.   I will follow-up with Benoit. 

Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 7:17 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; Anton Ivanov
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

	Please refer to what Benoit just said.

	—Tom

> On Jan 24, 2017:7:10 PM, at 7:10 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Tom:
> 
> Unclear what you are saying.  
> 
> Sue
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Nadeau
> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 3:02 PM
> To: Susan Hares
> Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; Anton Ivanov
> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on 
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
> 
> 
> 	Sue: 
> 
> 	The implication of that statement is that actual implementations (like ODL etc) now need to copy/paste this model without the I2RS text to use them in other ways. This seems strange and just about the most inefficient way to use these that I can think of.
> 
> 	—Tom
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 24, 2017:12:50 PM, at 12:50 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Anton:  
>> 
>> See earlier message to Martin.  Topology models are I2RS YANG Models 
>> designed for ephemeral state with specific security concerns.  This 
>> is not your basic YANG model no matter which data store ephemeral gets linked to.
>> Where is ephemeral state?  By IESG Design of charter, I2RS is not in 
>> charge of defining ephemeral state solution.  NETMOD/NETCONF are.  Go ask them.
>> 
>> Do not blame the messenger echoing NETMOD results,
>> 
>> Sue
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: i2rs [mailto:i2rs-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anton Ivanov
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2017 8:30 AM
>> To: i2rs@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on
>> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
>> 
>> On 24/01/17 11:52, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
>>> Susan,
>>> 
>>> so are these YANG models regular YANG models or are these YANG 
>>> models specific to the yet to be defined I2RS protocol and yet to be 
>>> defined datastores?
>>> 
>>> I think this is the core of Martin's and my question. A simple clear 
>>> and concise answer would be nice.
>> 
>> +1.
>> 
>> A.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> i2rs mailing list
>> i2rs@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> i2rs mailing list
>> i2rs@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> i2rs@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs

_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
i2rs@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs