Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <mbj@tail-f.com>
X-Original-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: i2rs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5F71294A6; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gfi5pk44FREd; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.tail-f.com (mail.tail-f.com [46.21.102.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED62312944B; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 09:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (h-148-188.a165.priv.bahnhof.se [176.10.148.188]) by mail.tail-f.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F15871AE012C; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 18:43:42 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 18:43:42 +0100
Message-Id: <20170203.184342.405194345934698538.mbj@tail-f.com>
To: Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN3PR02MB114192FEEF7116B20D314658F14F0@BN3PR02MB1141.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN3PR02MB11416DD67AB92C6620CEF7E4F14F0@BN3PR02MB1141.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <20170203.170800.1259525494650193374.mbj@tail-f.com> <BN3PR02MB114192FEEF7116B20D314658F14F0@BN3PR02MB1141.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2rs/i0veKs5863K5amNe2HjDa833tws>
Cc: draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org, i2rs@ietf.org, kwatsen@juniper.net
Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: i2rs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <i2rs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/i2rs/>
List-Post: <mailto:i2rs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs>, <mailto:i2rs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 17:43:46 -0000
Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] > > Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 11:08 AM > > To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> > > Cc: kwatsen@juniper.net; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org; > > i2rs@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3- > > topology-08: (with COMMENT) > > > > Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:mbj@tail-f.com] > > > > Sent: Friday, February 3, 2017 10:32 AM > > > > To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> > > > > Cc: kwatsen@juniper.net; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org; > > > > i2rs@ietf.org > > > > Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on > > > > draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3- > > > > topology-08: (with COMMENT) > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Kent, > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Kent Watsen [mailto:kwatsen@juniper.net] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 8:39 PM > > > > > > To: Xufeng Liu <Xufeng_Liu@jabil.com> > > > > > > Cc: i2rs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology@ietf.org > > > > > > Subject: Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on > > > > > > draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3- > > > > > > topology-08: (with COMMENT) > > > > > > > > > > > > [reducing distribution] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Xufeng, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assume the following model: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +--rw nodes > > > > > > > +--rw node [id] > > > > > > > +--rw id string > > > > > > > +--rw under-lay-attribute-a ??? > > > > > > > +---ro nodes-state > > > > > > > +--ro node [id] > > > > > > > +--ro id string > > > > > > > +--ro attribute-a string > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cannot define the under-lay-attribute-a to reference attribute-a as: > > > > > > > type leafref { > > > > > > > path "../node/attribute-a"' > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > True, but maybe it could be: > > > > > > > > > > > > type leafref { > > > > > > path "../node/attribute-a" > > > > > > require-instance false; > > > > > > description > > > > > > "In the case when the referenced instance is not a configured > > > > > > object, the system may resolve it by looking for it under the > > > > > > /nodes-state node. As the referenced operational state data > > > > > > may have a lifecycle independent of configuration, this results > > > > > > in an effect much like pre-provisioning interfaces in RFC > > > > > > 7223."; > > > > > > } > > > > > [Xufeng] I think that "require-instance false" does not help here. > > > > > The validation for path "../node/attribute-a" still fails because > > > > > "attribute-a" does not exist under /nodes/node/. > > > > > > > > No, "require-instance false" essentially turns off validation. > > > > Section > > > > 9.9.3 in RFC 7950 says: > > > > > > > > If "require-instance" is "false", it means that the instance being > > > > referred to MAY exist in valid data. > > > > > > > [Xufeng] My understanding is that this section talks about instance > > > "data" validation, but I was talking about schema validation. The path > > > statement is pointing to a non-existing schema node. > > > > Aha, ok. Yes, the path needs to refer to a valid schema node. So the path would > > be /nodes-state/node/attribute-a. > > > [Xufeng] Right. If we do so, the approach will be different from > RFC7223, and requires the capability that a "config true" leafref > references a "config false" leaf. You don't need any additional capability for this; if you tag the leafref with "require-instance false", it can reference config false (from config true). /martin
- [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Robert Varga
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Anton Ivanov
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Scharf, Michael (Nokia - DE)
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Anton Ivanov
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Anton Ivanov
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Benoit Claise
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Thomas Nadeau
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alia Atlas
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Anton Ivanov
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Anton Ivanov
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alia Atlas
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alia Atlas
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Giles Heron
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Andy Bierman
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alia Atlas
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alexander Clemm
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- [i2rs] What is RFC 7223 style pre-provisioning (w… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] What is RFC 7223 style pre-provisionin… Susan Hares
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kent Watsen
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Xufeng Liu
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kent Watsen
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alia Atlas
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kent Watsen
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Lou Berger
- Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Alexander Clemm