Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

[Kathleen Moriarty <[e-mail]>]

Thank you, Susan.

It looks like Benoit has included this in a discuss comment.  We can
discuss and make sure we reach a good result.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Kathleen:
>
> I have written a draft suggesting a template for the I2RS YANG modules
> which are designed to exist in the I2RS Ephemeral Control Plane data store
> (configuration and operational state).
>
> Draft location:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-i2rs-yang-sec-consider/
>
> I would appreciate an email discussion with the security ADs, OPS/NM ADs,
> and Routing AD (Alia Atlas).  I agree that this I2RS YANG data model (L3)
> and the base I2RS topology model should both provide updated YANG Security
> Considerations sections. I would appreciate if Benoit or you hold a discuss
> until we sort out these issues.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Sue
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kathleen Moriarty [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 9:44 PM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08:
> (with COMMENT)
>
> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I agree with Alissa's comment that the YANG module security consideration
> section guidelines need to be followed and this shouldn't go forward until
> that is corrected.  I'm told it will be, thanks.
>
>
>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen