Re: [i2rs] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT)

[Giles Heron <[e-mail]>]

> On 25 Jan 2017, at 15:18, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 10:07:45AM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote:
>> 
>> So - if one has models - such as a writable topology - where there
>> can be dependencies on dynamic data, then those models can't be in
>> the configuration data-store as currently defined.
>> 
> 
> Yes

but isn’t this confusing models and implementation?

if you have a case where you have a dependency on dynamic data then you can’t put that instantiation of the model in the configuration data-store.

but if your implementation never depends on dynamic data then it ought to be fine.

or again am I missing something obvious?

more to the point.  Alia - what’s the dependency on dynamic data that you’re concerned about?

Giles


> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> i2rs mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs