IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Sat, 29 April 2017 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CCC1242F5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmzkknhKnRZd for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:40:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22c.google.com (mail-it0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1237F120227 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id r185so4955542itd.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=4cZOC7Bmaqej+8HwgtYDCOo+4ASaroN0SobiOEHaReY=; b=dBXvsxLJLSagHWotcywWMAupUtHk/6UBm5qT8XOX8uCdqcN0c6nP6/6jjbTGdQ99it bJJUWT6nRqz/7AKx5JAMD+r2aLHZgRHlTC/uWRY9cWrxUoDEjqT5gyuqdgtU8+yXh1VC 5S/zYjzfx5PjNsbiFHRnY6FltqR/N/362DXv0ihVb7O8GGc33oIz09fnXX5h8XpArd8Z D9Nj5JG5bnhbGPHDOwZHc1L+a5nNnqUhO5zg2d1viX1Ra0WqtensPSUzj6qnW0vO5HVI hbPCb1tAm2bd0pfr7jC5Qx40EXd7lb0BMs8Ay0yBc79e1rYs12IQs256D/yWgT7PhM0O ag5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4cZOC7Bmaqej+8HwgtYDCOo+4ASaroN0SobiOEHaReY=; b=LbTqiwCYaBf4iemnuLk5fkI/Mj7PVLEkDMTI02cRFe1q2M2q454/1l8voLBOjJXGHl ynKfPLJXNLp6zfyByhDBLzm/v0nVBwEnncByYXBjPTnpshb7engKosZeVQEGRm/vd9zv Vje8smdrtcQuywAHzPUER9J11OC45CHEZRlUsz83Yeqk5qdPU6i5UCs2k3e/LnQFRX2c 0CVZDaTDXuXJf/mzvVYqYdEuZx0LG9lUPDUi+/QDRUTC4TF6uDYnk8wNGd35fZtdPgpn ifV4hkd3Zi6dR7Oq5pUavnUHea44IsyAGafjLA4RYijV7LDH3icoTqT757miaDPPJKMV zBVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7nfuAiTKsEjEHAWqxSXZ5rFr+MMt02CFDD+vbKWao2eg+9QPTO FGUqtJTKaojNSAl4KfqMmQoIG2lWyA==
X-Received: by 10.36.65.193 with SMTP id b62mr13305351itd.104.1493426273808; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.62.24 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.79.62.24 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:37:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m27f246ovd.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <9047A5A0-ED12-43C2-B2C5-D2A71CBB4373@arrcus.com> <D51D46A7.A9732%acee@cisco.com> <0A49219D-E721-4DA8-B9BF-A55C2FA36FBE@puck.nether.net> <D95C67A4-AEBF-400B-A360-61C342FD6E4A@arrcus.com> <CA+b+ER=hq0=JNRfF8VA76_aqeRMBCeyQm5aTbapysXGTgaGS_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaakVACiZKjk6XUi9mwkrCRsPqONUQmrTBCN7V43y+RtrQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2y3uk7h8p.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLaZXqA8-LnAdNOfhCQA+pq1fh1site_shSH+-gH0hCNeqQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9vg6snc.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAH1iCirW2qnmXyGQb5Db0UYjKhODhbeRxdZEGCWfiQRjWnkn5w@mail.gmail.com> <m27f246ovd.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 20:37:52 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: timaonWr0AcV7usmw5_Tk-D72k4
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=Dj=F6rCmZVtOuYmGQyO5fBZx0=18MdbuOhj3fB=XVKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113a61988c79e8054e4366e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/698a5isn60j1imAwlDdbFz3-GW8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:40:20 -0000

Actually in US they are ... leave aside that no one else in the world is
using GFIs in the actual outlets ;)

In any case if we are talking GFCI they all have nominal leaking current
which varies again region by region and application ... 6 - 50 mA.

Here we are talking 0 mA !!!


On Apr 28, 2017 20:28, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:

> i don't think gfi receptacles are upgraded in place
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email