IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> Mon, 24 April 2017 18:02 UTC

Return-Path: <enkechen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6010F129418 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.523
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.523 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sXKkUbeerXho for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E87E126CE8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=951; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1493056968; x=1494266568; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wzQak0DAELNJSsp/Tfbr64KP8pSQHjnZ1/e/8Xbae7s=; b=PG4jAic0AtwezYcD5F1PqufdfdOeVWezMsSmruc4/qUie7/EtdrpagZ/ CaYg2svKIrU/N8mfIpN2RXVIpKtoOZ4cnVOp+4HEFEkvd2t2he2uy8CbX 6iJqv2arEsYqBg49td6zFGYKHhYY9JukN0rOoWIcWVhtpcxguA1+32AMt U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,245,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="236944292"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Apr 2017 18:02:47 +0000
Received: from [10.82.216.254] (rtp-vpn3-254.cisco.com [10.82.216.254]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3OI2jtN024720; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:02:46 GMT
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <68B29403-9AD9-4F06-9FE4-3F077E793D9F@puck.nether.net> <275cf744-1f64-bcbc-dabe-a47479921230@cisco.com> <20170420154142.lacvtplusepy3qcf@hanna.meerval.net> <b57162ec-f806-6e86-7713-58608f72c468@cisco.com> <32C0B4EE-6241-49F9-97F2-7107AC68678D@juniper.net> <e513849d-f895-0499-7bf4-5ecb24cadab7@cisco.com> <4CE4AF1E-0C80-423E-B19D-5750FCAFAD89@juniper.net> <23283_1492759950_58F9B58E_23283_375_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC352B@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421084638.l6pbvtznfsxnq2wy@Vurt.local> <23291_1492766305_58F9CE61_23291_9725_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC399E@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421095839.sralcy7aos5mzzic@Vurt.local> <d57ed214-945a-54b8-e04f-cb8610f789e4@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704231447550.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se> <ee6e3ad8-d5c2-16c5-4464-3473d9a6443a@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704240928120.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
From: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <09173019-86ee-4f81-d57f-f664d642f633@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:02:45 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704240928120.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/U6IxROshvp0VBdaWrUOaoogrv9U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:02:49 -0000

It appears that you have missed a bunch of discussions in the thread.

The CLI migration falls apart when a customer skips releases and jumps
from one release ("permit all") to another ("deny all").

-- Enke

On 4/24/17 12:36 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2017, Enke Chen wrote:
> 
>> I don't think that folks are saying this "deny all" doe not make sense. When you start a *new*
>> software, certainly you are free to choose a default based on the most up-to-date knowledge.
> 
> There is no reason a new version of IOS couldn't have changed defaults, but CLI migration can
> fix this to keep the old default by adding a line when software is upgraded from an older
> default-open version.
> 
> If the new versio with default-deny has a command that gives syntax error in the old IOS,
> then this can be added to all neighbor configuring templates and will work identically on
> both the new and old version.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email