IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 19 April 2017 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D49129BE8 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g8xfmKRNxlUZ for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F5C1128792 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:30:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1192; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492644608; x=1493854208; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=evWfKyfPrjvZ99JmvVdYQDadtRfQbguUWuHzfu5h0mE=; b=NbtMzZ/QXR5y8edPw1Fe+0hw+3Ya+c9fqzB7qtAaqrzIPQyzBSKFVyLX N5/K/cgu1C9Lj0rAZtQncEwf+VGFVPchbOYP21TwSrfb1ZItmLkUwPpFV 0Bo1CW+Wk2vIUym1qF01bg/vlsOFlutmy0gbiVXsE4c76+fik6Any/Kqv I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AdAQBG8vdY/4cNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBg1SBbAeDYIoVkWKVYoIPhiQCGoNrPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQUjEUUQAgEIDgoCAh8HAgICMBUQAgQOBYoZqnWCJoseAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBIIELhyWDGYRXgwaCQB8BBJ0vAZJ7kUyUEAEfOIEFYxWFX4FKdYdegQ0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,222,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="411851920"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 19 Apr 2017 23:30:07 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (xch-rtp-003.cisco.com [64.101.220.143]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3JNU70L021618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:30:07 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-003.cisco.com (64.101.220.143) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:30:07 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 19:30:01 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
CC: "Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHSuV/NQxMnaaMdpE6dWAZuvCqOqKHNlW4A//++RoCAAET4AP//vkkA
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:30:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D51D6AD2.A9795%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <abe393d3-d1e4-7841-4620-38dab751765b@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnRz8BEO3mb1fnsDPoiL6Wxjdfw9vQPbyODNEa+xCJdnw@mail.gmail.com> <D51D67E4.A9782%acee@cisco.com> <AF07526F-F08B-4084-937B-A9A2D2DD2813@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <AF07526F-F08B-4084-937B-A9A2D2DD2813@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <EB0BC93F29312241ADDA3FEB14FD8012@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/97jx-IHQAGb1j347fX7UAmbR_6A>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:30:10 -0000


On 4/19/17, 7:25 PM, "John Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

>(As an individual contributor)
>
>On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>> the draft is conspicuously missing a “Backwards Compatibility” section.
>
>Seriously? "Backwards compatibility" in this case is "configure your
>router to do what it used to", right? We need a section to say that?

Anytime one proposes to change the default behavior of a decades old
protocol to be more restrictive, I would expect this to be discussed.

Thanks,
Acee 

>
>I must be missing something.
>
>Also, to Enke's "we can't ever change our defaults" point -- there are
>many RFCs. Some you probably comply with. Some you probably don't. How
>would this be different, assuming you elect not to change your
>implementation to comply?
>
>Thanks,
>
>--John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email