Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Job Snijders <> Mon, 01 May 2017 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F22E1277BB for <>; Mon, 1 May 2017 06:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.101
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qn39YqTLRgZB for <>; Mon, 1 May 2017 06:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0AAA128B38 for <>; Mon, 1 May 2017 06:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id r190so97454764wme.1 for <>; Mon, 01 May 2017 06:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IQaweHABiw4USH0oYo4JBEC4sLx+Xe5sy5HFejzmrDc=; b=JuM0Wege9qmAkwyj+FDPIGScTwLqPaHFj8Rf6B/vXCwMhEN4CttN30j485nmha2kla Vt9xMC3qO4a3dSb/K97pOgzefan8OUXBP1okH6H1SplGwC63WiZbBb/vN52kVCgJ9Uva Rywl0lEAz41bTKUjyGUP7wFTYNy/tjVCjWAiXYBM42nVXtRIocbLiYfiVQTosz4v80qn nwiEPLK7kr7ubcfhXq4TA23oBgjozHDFtSxJgiipPP1BWDKE15PaXi6LkdHPuGzzEnF4 5Sboaz/R81Mm2HUZ80Q5dLDbHA3jBpgS+uJwppXKcPDWJbJwwhfAPU9RmgSqssTnsw76 etvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=IQaweHABiw4USH0oYo4JBEC4sLx+Xe5sy5HFejzmrDc=; b=gNI3EAGDzOI+kgdZL7bCgm37AIp/2+iNC8wZxs6utNRtE/2wOkQX90QDQFaqm9dsNR gprQjpLDVe06PUIxz3k65qbc2k10VLWH2V4mZa2fUzhqWa8OJG5wDQ6zxl61Z1kEgU4H Zmhviqjt3NsWqhyPH6d8BRKzl3eIsVlQoWdkJrwLOibl/GezYlsjX8gjXKmQvHQwtgK4 c466iOCLWSTGoiJsJ446JxXCghFqooS0vdi7Rn3mBPQkcyYh/n4K0Jdl9XL0aE4gKY3h A2+Og/wJ3K05qBQ5DITLFgtLPU/kFs7j0BFeo72KezUq33/4kvWdY4ZZ62kSKMAWxloc i+jA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4NalhChf57fzeNodmJa2pWHagQ1dRYAh+HlWHzkEg/Y9GYEgCx Yw2dG6YamC/LXQ==
X-Received: by with SMTP id 21mr20023823eds.104.1493645027894; Mon, 01 May 2017 06:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:14c0:327d:7e70:a488]) by with ESMTPSA id a56sm7132272edd.48.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 01 May 2017 06:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 15:23:44 +0200
From: Job Snijders <>
To: Randy Bush <>
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 13:26:46 -0000

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 01:30:26PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> but ignoring broken analogies and to the point, in the case of this
> draft, the operator is in definite danger of a major oops (that's a
> technical term) when field upgrading the software in a router.
> despite this exposure, i am mostly of the opinion that the benefits
> outweigh the risks with this draft.  but vendors should do their best to
> ameliorate the risks with loud warnings.

In addition to warnings, perhaps some inspiration can be drawn from the
deprecation of SSHv1 in OpenSSH. This too required a process that
spanned several years (and isn't finished yet, since distributions
haven't yet incorporated the latest upstream version of OpenSSH, but
alas). If OpenSSH can do it, so can others! :-)


Considerations of others regarding SSHv1:


Kind regards,