IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Wed, 19 April 2017 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C09128792 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DXZ4GdrUT9lo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0113.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D65E9127337 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=jHzMkZULEr80sGCDagONCvih4Fp+7gP70es+AWAEHBI=; b=iMyLrjjEdW0VAGfz7JIh8hiXJOQhrj0YX0hp/SGoI+4cbdZOVidYlUsuMxMRwJ2VPacCfAf1ArY1PEoX15e+MEwlNL2XJIN3xF8LtUXgAnzrJxXe8iIGdp+bg+uaLQUFY5/PKfBg7XOk2BhNKiJLn6tM4c/ub1CHZk6Tk9SycYM=
Received: from CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.10.134) by CY1PR05MB2508.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.167.10.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1047.6; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:25:09 +0000
Received: from CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.10.134]) by CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.167.10.134]) with mapi id 15.01.1047.008; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:25:08 +0000
From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: "Enke Chen (enkechen)" <enkechen@cisco.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHSuWQvp3Q+amjrFUC5PeWc81WgJg==
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:25:08 +0000
Message-ID: <AF07526F-F08B-4084-937B-A9A2D2DD2813@juniper.net>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <abe393d3-d1e4-7841-4620-38dab751765b@cisco.com> <CA+b+ERnRz8BEO3mb1fnsDPoiL6Wxjdfw9vQPbyODNEa+xCJdnw@mail.gmail.com> <D51D67E4.A9782%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D51D67E4.A9782%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [75.151.14.9]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR05MB2508; 7:EV09x2q9uDqU6jY4cA/523Lqfdc/Li++Gd5lFRx2EDLksoR/zX/POWqWl1yOfDUfNSHEU02goGAjpaL1B0VZ1o+KO8MFSjAQVUqzSlzzv0P5+ElKUMrzLZ8AuLlBfj2a/CSZefcGig68u0TzPbO1y3XHuFNaxnongQA5PyaTRv6kKLZw8+dhOp+sXvBaOz1+7oWXhaE7SEtc2NU1El9wLSoPCxlQ0elnCF3fZa/ZkoT24LE315PVKMqRQU3yfGybM4hr8YvIPsUC21O5TrX1A0jUJqUOfWMoaTng0T+jFuv2ueOaWVfmuq9Z4bFKUs0M/aHiKWjfKTjXQBPSVgvaRQ==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d18c24ba-6690-4593-6841-08d4877b51cd
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254075)(48565401081)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:CY1PR05MB2508;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY1PR05MB25088CE51DFA8B9383E8F3D4AA180@CY1PR05MB2508.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040450)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201703011903075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(20161123562025)(20161123560025)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(6072148); SRVR:CY1PR05MB2508; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR05MB2508;
x-forefront-prvs: 028256169F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(39840400002)(39860400002)(39450400003)(39410400002)(39400400002)(39850400002)(377454003)(24454002)(2900100001)(5660300001)(6436002)(6506006)(33656002)(7736002)(77096006)(86362001)(230783001)(93886004)(54356999)(81166006)(76176999)(50986999)(6116002)(3846002)(102836003)(305945005)(8676002)(8936002)(189998001)(25786009)(2950100002)(4326008)(6246003)(110136004)(38730400002)(2906002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(54906002)(229853002)(53936002)(6512007)(99286003)(6916009)(66066001)(36756003)(122556002)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR05MB2508; H:CY1PR05MB2507.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5DD65FE86683E846BCF77A6973783323@junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 Apr 2017 23:25:08.7083 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR05MB2508
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AUyUjB9bTfGOhF0I549AsyFQPVg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 23:25:12 -0000

(As an individual contributor)

On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> the draft is conspicuously missing a “Backwards Compatibility” section.

Seriously? "Backwards compatibility" in this case is "configure your router to do what it used to", right? We need a section to say that?

I must be missing something. 

Also, to Enke's "we can't ever change our defaults" point -- there are many RFCs. Some you probably comply with. Some you probably don't. How would this be different, assuming you elect not to change your implementation to comply?

Thanks,

--John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email