IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 21 April 2017 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4D1270AC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBY9Lk7OIPtM for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48358126C23 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id a103so134241048ioj.1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=9pHV8m1zWtZme6tVAVYACWQ2ONavYR1qgB+JhbBwGIs=; b=QHPYivMDCiznpGcOtC9Ub1FeazLEyMc4E0JmyCKCMrBaFe4yCIU8mys4kH4cYpwkI/ zIBwNkTyiKzPq7mZ2SKCCePaFZd4rms7EHWyk6gvWYuKND4MIyMEzxKYP5SaBc+pphFF cR2BWXtP9Bb4s58yft5gGzJ29er4wq0l0hTO1vkRhAlSBq1CrCJMQcHxu6cTPGMV8CmN UfjQz1fnq++99HQytJP54LGi2MUFmzK/5qWXbnMDkXmEojkrUtMeD15Mgk4VkstUhwYr 4PxwVVQXWh9qgEH2XNOwe9iL3YnEudL6IpuwHOFu2bYUjX9zfrg67Y9DXz1K9R8F89nP pQwg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9pHV8m1zWtZme6tVAVYACWQ2ONavYR1qgB+JhbBwGIs=; b=geoNm5pK3PTx/XXiCmxffwI5vamf9WuErDVLa8ro6cxg/62ELQxMLlUUqmls2OSeO8 XMk+57SfR1caks7GnrKJSWjZjYiW6mU3XDligx2wJSkWRizf3bAntbxVE33booU7tGiV w7aL/ifc6xG0sxh0rNtJSSATTBsRVRRCUH2Ph33rNONhM9RNS/LC7u1+83v2M6erIKTr 7Q+CCxZTImdmHpwfIga0j1oAYUKqnawfjaHP7hv6cthtAqEm9417/ObEyeJcAjlqZLuZ QOikZawObHnTeFuMyGYdhmvJVdXCmxLKnT8arXLm4KI1Pwz+Oo+98FaDL2+BZaT+Egd+ wOrA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/62PfoTOk35jvr8m9RbNle1q+M24vUxThdTfz39PTKQq3jeWerU ehLbUmlCSDNlyy+nO3Kfy6Z9jPvefglP
X-Received: by 10.107.16.135 with SMTP id 7mr18509115ioq.228.1492808041681; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.170.4 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170421202711.oz67skxxzk6svpeh@Vurt.local>
References: <20170420154142.lacvtplusepy3qcf@hanna.meerval.net> <b57162ec-f806-6e86-7713-58608f72c468@cisco.com> <20170420160736.GB15676@puck.nether.net> <75AC1A50-3DF8-4852-8FC6-BC302B121946@cisco.com> <CAH1iCirf=ha1mrw8EUzPp34R-DF=4J+=aFyMwVn2udi1UKNifw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+wi2hMPYcwbNhHtuWKWUXb4Lg3x81p786yLqeNEHFV1okGRvg@mail.gmail.com> <dc04fe80-f844-29b1-2676-8f2bbda0ecbe@juniper.net> <28014_1492762849_58F9C0E0_28014_6541_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC3773@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421090145.f5yuhimb4qg7knrf@Vurt.local> <CA+b+ERkw39d3E3wsceVWQAb05peEmt=qgBkYdN5j8T_5XzSZ7Q@mail.gmail.com> <20170421202711.oz67skxxzk6svpeh@Vurt.local>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 22:54:00 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ozxQnyOPcHQCIE1F6Ddu7uvp8oM
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkzu2Hv65h4BiJannxiKPXHAPokCth+PqQzTk=LkKcF3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
Cc: "bruno.decraene@orange.com" <bruno.decraene@orange.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113fe9c20ad9b3054db3755b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bQA186KZZSlDIzFtIcfCNDrk4rI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 20:54:04 -0000

>
> Here is one reference https://www.ietf.org/mail-arch
> ive/web/grow/current/msg03718.html
>
> Kind regards,
> Job
>

​On the list there was three emails on this including Jon's you quote who
was rather for #1 ...
"IPv4/IPv6 unicast AFI/SAFI EBGP only"

​I do not see any discussion on that which would be anywhere comparable to
number of IDR WG members suggesting to limit it only to 1/1 & 2/1.

Thx,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email