Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sat, 27 December 2014 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341731AD45B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:36:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJAwRsk80wxe for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:36:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3611AD45A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Dec 2014 17:36:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1F72CC5D; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:36:20 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5B0np0PkFCPo; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:36:19 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A972CC4D; Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:36:19 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1EAF0D8D-8811-44DF-9972-55D19D286CC9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADD870E-87B8-4239-92EA-661F9802F4FD@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 03:36:17 +0200
Message-Id: <4D2749C7-E258-4663-BB88-AF69F8DF3B6B@piuha.net>
References: <5614C286-0CD2-4DAD-A846-510EE38D1B9A@ietf.org> <CADD870E-87B8-4239-92EA-661F9802F4FD@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/-LkgYB_Qdv04vQHea5k6uHvYX9U
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 01:36:23 -0000

Fred:

> I find the date, um, "interesting”. Personally, on December 25, I am involved with other activities. I note that my company generally makes financial announcements a few minutes after NASDAQ closes, and a variety of organizations make announcements when they think nobody is listening. Is the IETF...?

I apologize for the date. Obviously we will ensure that there’s sufficient time to provide feedback. We posted the message as soon as it was ready, the IESG had worked hard before the holidays on this. Please do not let this discussion disturb you holidays; I myself do not plan to work much if at all before next year, and there is certainly enough time to discuss once we are there.

Jari