RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.

"Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com> Wed, 09 June 2021 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rwilton@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AEB3A13E3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 05:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_SBL=0.5, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=T9OIbvwo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=BM4WqJmE
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EQCp1xx23L2Q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 05:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93BC43A13E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 05:24:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18142; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1623241454; x=1624451054; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=9iVKwNA8/U7HbLJECcMGb7031TRY7aSPO4s8smsxtF4=; b=T9OIbvwoBPs1SJzBmD8CJc1cEL53znfRaccdsP0o/v8ut9hjgBRBoMuw LRTvZYLZgilmhLxL0jk4AvBgJ299SwHy6VuFMPL5S0EPrGJRW34l6eBAo e7oMhLAP0H8QdKAE0gfOYcG8XOs08JHQVFlVat/TZPG0ByRuc5IJ4Qs5p E=;
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:n5XLLBN9qzoo6kdTO2cl6nfjWUAX0o4cdiYZ75M9gPRPf7ituZP4Mx+X6fZsiQrPWoPWo7JBhvHNuq/tEWoH/d6asX8EfZANMn1NicgfkwE6RsLQD0r9Ia3maiUgF4JDWUNruXahPhsdFMP3fVaHpHq04HYbEQn+MgwgIOPzF8bSgs272vr09YfUZlBDhSG2ZvV5KxDlxTg=
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23: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
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C7CgB8scBg/5BdJa1aHgEBCxIMggwLgSMwIwYoB3daNzELhD2DSAOFOYh3A4pKik2FAIJTA1QLAQEBDQEBNwgCBAEBhFACF4FhAiU3Bg4CBAEBARIBAQUBAQECAQYEcROFaA2GRQEBAQQSBgsKEwEBLAsBDwIBCBEEAQEoAwICAjAUCQgCBA4FCAwOglCBflcDLwEDC5h8AYE6AoofeoEygQGCBwEBBgQEgUhBg0IYgjEDBoE6gnuEDAEBhmEnHIFJRIEVQ4JgPoIgQgEBAoFgKwmCYTaCLoFpY2BJEBQ8QU0afI1qCYZOhA6EAY0ekSRbCoMciCeBaI4UhWwSg16RSpA8oWmDKJRxAgQCBAUCDgEBBoFqJYFZcBWDJFAXAg6GcoctgSQBCIJDgmSHenMCAQE0AgYBCQEBAwl8iTQBgRABAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.83,260,1616457600"; d="scan'208,217";a="808438428"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Jun 2021 12:24:11 +0000
Received: from mail.cisco.com (xbe-aln-006.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 159CO4Il010374 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:24:11 GMT
Received: from xfe-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.227.253) by xbe-aln-006.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:24:04 -0500
Received: from xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) by xfe-rcd-005.cisco.com (173.37.227.253) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:24:04 -0500
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xfe-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.792.15 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:24:04 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ZfokXLUKkBx4IehuiiWuqVOvt98weNilQOIIH/G3F9xyaakEFDboRLF7UwoxS/wiyuJwbGojHq5Z/9eADRGH/gmqEcCHtC1jssHq7x6P6PrcwOOpXjpVk0PMO7LX5oZv14aDX4SCP3vpin69+fRWS8zlMmFywh8Yag6y5svBltP+KLZeKd9H6PNdRNA1s8FrlN5S8hCV6YjP4lLGoLJK6frfuvrWZVd6tpsTjZIH6EzjDVKmknUkLt2f80XIlsSfzkD8GNTkskIxF2NSh82AWaRTolF5vIL4nCwxlOvw4YKs99iDhs1epyB8gi1qRxyYVXC/DgOvL2fpUMsQRxbscQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9iVKwNA8/U7HbLJECcMGb7031TRY7aSPO4s8smsxtF4=; b=ZaaOPrz5tEn45V/SaG4zmHA+6b4vC4vd/ztaS5rtjaq0CqpEbC4CbG9t7ifQPv/M5d4nC/V2ZQd3oHEfWPjopsYTTacBJIcbl7Dd4EEZggKhHwQKb/ttvFU10TfPE0tEmGF+Mu9SCcpcZykRZ6FNTrZ+BqjOxBCtYH275zl0g+r5Y4Af/BvOIPgPZyudpH3LIVs2irT5Ty8NZXppURj3m5VQ1Y3ZBWxHW8NXKd8e/aL4Sqr00E2sEanMkhkVNcw22VOwft9vVEcGAZE8DMzjvCNxKDzxUlXHxDATKVLK7mce0/Yvc7iU6gIHTlXaoA30pN7wmf1Tz5zfnwE67xQMlA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=9iVKwNA8/U7HbLJECcMGb7031TRY7aSPO4s8smsxtF4=; b=BM4WqJmEd7bq9N1j2oqtrd09SfTAYMIComXA6AvRjdCgjDdkYjaPNiHgwAQH5fXPRTRnklq0GUaDJyOsWF8YaUoJHkkMInIyvxMvqgcKT2ju5iIVj3DALv+JVhT0cw3ED1VKBD5jO8CvWI/CnnDBh0R/0HErMDw4ZIeol2D89Tk=
Received: from DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:399::21) by DM4PR11MB5437.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:5:398::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.4195.24; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:24:02 +0000
Received: from DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4114:3fb6:8a7e:198c]) by DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4114:3fb6:8a7e:198c%7]) with mapi id 15.20.4195.030; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:24:02 +0000
From: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
To: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
Thread-Topic: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
Thread-Index: AQHXWlsdQTX9p28unkubmWBcO8DWPqsGD+EAgAAJnICABPepAIAAalzAgAAT14CAAAl8AA==
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 12:24:02 +0000
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB5438CC6D84B301C907DAA6D1B5369@DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <DM4PR11MB54387DB8502A81F94E00DCC9B5369@DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <C199C23C-5470-4B53-8F5D-408FBE8ABE63@yahoo.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <C199C23C-5470-4B53-8F5D-408FBE8ABE63@yahoo.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dmarc.ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc.ietf.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [82.12.233.180]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8a922a45-ae74-4e41-fc94-08d92b4177a3
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM4PR11MB5437:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM4PR11MB5437DA539C063F85EB48341BB5369@DM4PR11MB5437.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(376002)(136003)(346002)(47680400002)(186003)(71200400001)(76116006)(8676002)(9326002)(2906002)(26005)(33656002)(66556008)(66446008)(66476007)(66946007)(64756008)(4326008)(8936002)(53546011)(316002)(6506007)(478600001)(45080400002)(7696005)(38100700002)(9686003)(966005)(55016002)(122000001)(54906003)(166002)(5660300002)(86362001)(83380400001)(66574015)(52536014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM4PR11MB5438CC6D84B301C907DAA6D1B5369DM4PR11MB5438namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM4PR11MB5438.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8a922a45-ae74-4e41-fc94-08d92b4177a3
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jun 2021 12:24:02.8854 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: DSYTbF0STKIUHRaiBsggdLjPdBcubh9f8lQg/ozmdaPjSzgzPLf0VNddT0Soa+YP4rrGlSf4PgKXGrsBaAl23g==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM4PR11MB5437
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.21, xbe-aln-006.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4FmQGaPF7sruJKNRsaE98gOocr0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 12:24:20 -0000

Hi Lloyd,

Okay, I agree that all contributions to public github repositories are likely to come under the github community guidelines that you link to below, but I still disagree that IETF contributions are bound by the first Microsoft open-source specific policy that you linked to – since I do not regard the IETF (or Github) as a “Microsoft-managed open source community”.

Perhaps it would be helpful for someone to do an offline check on whether there is anything in the github-community-guidelines policy that conflicts with the IETF community guidelines – I’ll check with Jay and the IESG.  But at a high level, it scans as “be nice to your fellow humans” and seems reasonable to me.  Specifically, nothing in those guidelines jumps out at me as prohibiting or hindering our ability to have courteous technical discussions about Internet standards.

Regards,
Rob


From: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 09 June 2021 12:25
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: Lloyd W <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>; Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.

Rob,

simply put, that's the short version - based on, but often not needing to repeat, the more expansive GitHub policy version at

https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-community-guidelines

-- which Microsoft manages, since Microsoft owns GitHub, so IETF use of GitHub falls under all of those Microsoft rules.

Lloyd Wood
lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>

and you haven't read that one either.


On 9 Jun 2021, at 20:29, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:

Hi Lloyd,

My reading of that code of conduct is that it only applies to Microsoft run open-source projects rather than all open-source projects hosted on Github.  I.e., I would not regard IETF work hosted on github as coming under the scope of that code of conduct.

I’ve not read the policy closely, but at a quick glance it also looks reasonable to me.

Regards,
Rob


From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Lloyd W
Sent: 09 June 2021 04:53
To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com<mailto:dean.willis@softarmor.com>>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.

It's worth pointing out that, as the IETF increases its reliance on Microsoft-owned github, and discussion moves more and more from IETF-managed mailing lists to git pull requests, IETF discussions become subject to Microsoft's own underlying social media rules. Git has now morphed from a complex command-line tool into a social network with, like, the worst interface ever, which makes it a natural fit with the computing vistas of Redmond.

https://microsoft.github.io/codeofconduct/

Still, good to know who runs things around here.
Lloyd Wood
lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>

now I really miss Myspace.



On 6 Jun 2021, at 10:02, Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com<mailto:dean.willis@softarmor.com>> wrote:

But just a few weeks ago, we had a "tools" survey circulating, and several of the questions related to using assorted social media platforms for IETF work.

If you can get banned for a kill -9 comment -- well, we really can't be using that platform for IETF stuff. Even for jokes, apparently.