IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Sun, 06 June 2021 03:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625E13A3AB2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=softarmor.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EoyuUfiTR1iC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D15F03A3AB1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 20:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 03:48:32 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=softarmor.com; s=protonmail; t=1622951318; bh=dJm4obDw7JPwEFxf/ntUmuNdppLLIzhHeLkI33rRzPM=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=hWE+Mk3IVihaOXLnZMuY0ybDZRs60imWxVuoiKNyXzEQ8njkrRK6ydHaqYBGvyJRP 7o2gyOvQQaemhn1d2pTDy21VZEJjCfk44zjw45WspZEyik6o8ZQTUF7A02y/cN2gnW 8inuoohpALgX0uG2tdMkivJNxCBohlvpgnsJNqocRKV7UtqN9whdLcZ8Vdny8zKA0W gIMacaqw2rujsfd1psST0ViTBhGBcdxSRFxPnSNrkDxb85nOV4Rydqnnu0n8sP51FF 9b8OVJah1991BvJv64utojklfnRwGtc20KK95Ok+Lr0tMhfKSCWWlu/Rp7wn5PdoXo sZ44LqZn7pp1w==
To: phill@hallambaker.com
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Reply-To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
Message-ID: <kgFRgVMjBmAAi51vBqO0MUjYsZy6W-Ynt-eTs7R5hpfmkzeHf7M56NKf0IleO7k6y4onDRqi1V05AutO0k6kYv3--B9cGN5mnT4dEVJJK5I=@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwgeZ787ae00+=fw8BP=n5OQ_TMsbtEeG16Zau=5O2Gxrg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <HJCFnRF4-BhmmY94naAXr7OwaHttkaKO4_PJx6u2V8ZyHKfo91h0wX96saMVs0sI6KM2vx-h6B-j1dGqj6XqneGrdw-smKRSp9LYfmYZGsg=@softarmor.com> <CALZ3u+a+ry4pd5eAB3QiboA2pwiVhTgc0D4Zte5_u+bj-GsonA@mail.gmail.com> <-Jo05E3w-YIEezoXLI6MpB83ZYosN9BemjreW0cpF-DKiwGfD1pdvjQNWNIRYKnfiqfQR46Ny1e5Ee2ppuMlGTLU1Jei_S4gcB1V9tc6YFI=@softarmor.com> <CAMm+LwgeZ787ae00+=fw8BP=n5OQ_TMsbtEeG16Zau=5O2Gxrg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_27jQxgobe2EnS8x0QeWES1duhKthQluNl2G4dhX7fg"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XQgalr9FmfDNmzTej6uFpLmTC-E>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 03:48:47 -0000

-------- Original Message --------
On Jun 5, 2021, 10:17 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote:

Mathematical Mesh 3.0 Part VII: Mesh Callsign Service (ietf.org)

----

This is exactly where I was trying to go with P2P-SIP/RELOAD but didn't get to, and it seems quite clever. The key is in using the distributed tree to store ephemeral but still relatively long-lived registrations, not massive or rapidly changing data.

--
Dean

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email