Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Sun, 06 June 2021 17:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB9F3A21D0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=softarmor.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vU0FKwt6rrpw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40131.protonmail.ch (mail-40131.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C58AB3A21CE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 6 Jun 2021 10:12:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:11:54 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=softarmor.com; s=protonmail; t=1622999521; bh=X+vqQNGx3Vn5BYaDut3HZ5Acv98z9ujhxUPBhk6rlxE=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Gugj+OY4NJ7sP1MlXNHB/RABrarneC+p2xOp+G498pu8cz0Ncxd6x8SKD+WTBElwx lAmlfRaAlVLPVrcoavTZNixEWymmRmJRAb7wdQ9YCUVrnnsi8rb2xaEAxmMCkywHv2 nZOseRK0DC+sv/GjDuY1EbdTRpDk+5Qqfxe4nZrWTW3a1cZLvW5TOwaGoAVlqYVweh otGD2JdPPg1shzcbnK5/SQPThjP6aa2u4UkqIe+93lTjzndH0yZedcvZPP0laooCpg 26qwRHlDHwzawsPlGkaZOMT254uBf77QgPHDA+iSDJIAU7Pp85pf9pNhsKrmYsiVyQ QocR0sCEMoHkQ==
To: rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Reply-To: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
Subject: Re: Why we really can't use Facebook for technical discussion.
Message-ID: <JzB0rKldZsqztdwMXmpr25hkQUtlfd6ahsb0G9iAWj6UfTErmWhQTPvLFAeMFWx5fC9CgMYI7KQfTJfzdmwwKwCzvnITtpirmhHpQLBSvuQ=@softarmor.com>
In-Reply-To: <625EA0EC-B4FE-457D-AE26-2D342B5ED7FB@akamai.com>
References: <HJCFnRF4-BhmmY94naAXr7OwaHttkaKO4_PJx6u2V8ZyHKfo91h0wX96saMVs0sI6KM2vx-h6B-j1dGqj6XqneGrdw-smKRSp9LYfmYZGsg=@softarmor.com> <E1920BE6-34CA-4246-8424-928EC0BA77B7@puck.nether.net> <010801d75a97$04e30f70$0ea92e50$@acm.org> <625EA0EC-B4FE-457D-AE26-2D342B5ED7FB@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_5VsjsBiIjrXw3fb232uE2BPCszh9Kwnm5ZmYCdLtmBA"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Hv8fFWagqZ1v_H6OWemFqOV8rHI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2021 17:12:11 -0000

-------- Original Message --------
On Jun 6, 2021, 8:58 AM, Salz, Rich < rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> "Kill them all and let TCP sort it out" can readily be expressed in other terms. A content moderation policy that slowed down frequent postings (by 24 hours) might temper heated conversations and lead to calmer considerations of the actual requirements.
For those who don't know, it is worth doing a web search on the original phrase. It comes from a history of extreme violence, and apparently even today is used by the US elite forces. Not a good look.

----

Tell me, Rich -- do you cringe and demand that Apple and the Linux community rename the "kill" command every time you have to terminate a rogue process from the command line? Or do you campaign for the rogue process's right to live, despite the fact that it is sucking up memory and making your system unstable?

It amazes me how postmodern thinking has
left us entirely without a sense of humor and induced an oversized sense of groupthink.

And for those who invoke Postel's maxim as a justification for censorship -- I don't think you would have tolerated its outspoken author, at all.

--
Dean