Re: discussion style and respect
Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 23:57 UTC
Return-Path: <masinter@adobe.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974A91B34AE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:57:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XGS5P46wV2NT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0693.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::693]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 228E71B34AD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.161.142.21) by DM2PR02MB1321.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.161.142.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.184.17; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:57:11 +0000
Received: from DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.142.21]) by DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.142.21]) with mapi id 15.01.0190.013; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:57:11 +0000
From: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
Thread-Topic: discussion style and respect
Thread-Index: AQHQnxPlRUxyI26EqkiVRFkjqWYgbZ2nkSgA
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:57:11 +0000
Message-ID: <E1ABC482-D989-4760-8A4E-7DA34BF96ED4@adobe.com>
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150508
authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [50.184.24.49]
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR02MB1321;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR02MB13214AF927F98DADAA1BA174C3BC0@DM2PR02MB1321.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(520003)(3002001); SRVR:DM2PR02MB1321; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR02MB1321;
x-forefront-prvs: 0604AFA86B
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(92566002)(50986999)(66066001)(36756003)(83716003)(83506001)(54356999)(46102003)(76176999)(33656002)(15975445007)(110136002)(102836002)(77096005)(82746002)(107886002)(5001960100002)(189998001)(15395725005)(62966003)(122556002)(77156002)(99286002)(2950100001)(19580395003)(87936001)(1720100001)(2900100001)(450100001)(86362001)(106116001)(2656002)(5002640100001)(4001350100001)(40100003)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR02MB1321; H:DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CB3DBABD644AEB4DB693DFB4D070280B@namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 11 Jun 2015 23:57:11.6495 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR02MB1321
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9M_-mOL-Woeb0QOtmzcE7q6vIKE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:57:19 -0000
1. Consider the possibility that some of the cases are deliberate trolling http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll#Corporate.2C_political_and_special_interest_sponsored_trolls as an attack on the IETF and the Internet. 2. http://dilbert.com/strip/2015-06-07 is an anti-pattern: (“misinterpret every comment you make as an absurd absolute and then attack it …”) 3. terse can be dismissive, dismissive can be rude but not always, and it’s better to encourage terse. Larry
- discussion style and respect IETF Chair
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- RE: discussion style and respect Eric Gray
- RE: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Nico Williams
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- RE: discussion style and respect Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Harald Alvestrand
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Tim Chown
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Hector Santos
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Larry Masinter
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Jari Arkko
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John Leslie
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- Re: discussion style and respect jmh.direct
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Tobias Gondrom
- Re: discussion style and respect t.p.
- Re: discussion style and respect Dan Harkins