IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: discussion style and respect

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 20:17 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42BA31B3164 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8WTY0dgy394J for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5ED61B3163 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacyx8 with SMTP id yx8so9003863pac.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y+4rq2/KE7mJu9kRo9OMzJvlY5xIexEPIBAsjP/WgEA=; b=eySN8M25gHBJHaU8ydokb+HPE9WCe8wI3kyiMVed9sOqE/Mz8tsYD9ro9/5+5AUHpe FmxEC9G/M8avtgTNP3qXPYLi6OK6XyocVpl0gZMabNO2C1juWmfv67JPMb5t9XvJo/Od YOJWWra3F66o/LVaaWYJ2cQp+f9gHti4LJwIRUXJzvG2fvNmCcktVYxWQxZZUAnrkmmE rM52qyPbmuKTBU/puaP+AGBTWLwdxZiOvGPgqKkKweq7kvBaKtb7gjmedKJ5pZPZBEC7 v0Eg4r4C8emqD/zt8HYuSN/b2S8taKJEjsuML4N5JzqipoSOdKuGvMTAbhI4/n0ICuil MHdw==
X-Received: by 10.66.182.229 with SMTP id eh5mr17469869pac.18.1434053875356; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (66-230-103-227-rb1.nwc.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.103.227]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id rd7sm1508352pdb.64.2015.06.11.13.17.53 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:17:54 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5579ECF0.4080708@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 12:17:52 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com> <5578AB4F.3020406@dcrocker.net> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF632D561D2@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <20150610215800.867D91B2C4A@ietfa.amsl.com> <1798EE63-68EF-491F-A4EB-4B55ED0359EF@gmail.com> <55793DBB.9010508@cisco.com> <CAG4d1rdmbXZaUPCAbCdHaYqseXjs7c5yCyykvE9mi=5yNviL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rdmbXZaUPCAbCdHaYqseXjs7c5yCyykvE9mi=5yNviL7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xkNIeWX-Bs5oFkBbPPmQK3fFP-8>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:17:57 -0000

On 6/11/15 11:44 AM, Alia Atlas wrote:
> One aspect is to work on improving and discussing how to handle 
> consensus issues for the WG Chairs. Anyone who hasn't read through
> RFC 7282 really should.  In the Routing area, we've been having 
> periodic Working Group chair training sessions.  You can see the 
> presentation and recording for the one we did "On Consensus" at: 
> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/WGChairTraining .

These are really nice - might be useful as a basis for a
working group chairs training track.  Right now there really
isn't such thing - the working group chairs training sessions
are useful and I think need to continue as is, but some sort
of training for new chairs seems valuable and might help us
avoid some of what's under discussion at the moment.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email