RE: discussion style and respect
Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 21:42 UTC
Return-Path: <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7721B2C0B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:42:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwy_noLzMUI3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80111ACD03 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 14:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c6180641-f79086d000001909-19-5578493d7d59
Received: from EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.96]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id C7.AC.06409.D3948755; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:27:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from EUSAAMB107.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.124]) by EUSAAHC008.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.96]) with mapi id 14.03.0210.002; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 17:41:57 -0400
From: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>
To: "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: discussion style and respect
Thread-Topic: discussion style and respect
Thread-Index: AQHQnxPscfx9r1PE5ESHr1ApMlq+eZ2mgFAAgAAMkID//7+xYA==
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:41:56 +0000
Message-ID: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF632D561D2@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com> <5578AB4F.3020406@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <5578AB4F.3020406@dcrocker.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.9]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrLLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPgq6tZ0WowdI95ha/P31gs3i2cT6L xZR1WQ7MHpd2nmTzmPx4DqPHkiU/mQKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyep88Zi74J1yxa9FqtgbG PcJdjJwcEgImEse6ZzBD2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEjjKKHG9/wM7hLOcUWJO93d2kCo2AQ2JY3fW MoLYIgLNjBJPXzuD2MICmhJzD7ZCxbUkTh54zwphO0lM79wLFmcRUJV4/r6TCcTmFfCVWPh6 NSvEgk5GiabFd8AWcAroSDxqmM4CYjMCnfT91BqwBmYBcYlbT+YzQZwqILFkz3mos0UlXj7+ xwphK0rs658ONIcDqF5TYv0ufYhWRYkp3Q/ZIfYKSpyc+YRlAqPoLCRTZyF0zELSMQtJxwJG llWMHKXFqWW56UaGmxiB8XFMgs1xB+OCT5aHGAU4GJV4eBdolocKsSaWFVfmHmKU5mBREueV 9ssLFRJITyxJzU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cC4xfWvxdmpYisKwtuS58UJyqnYJcn0vzqb a3n39ZpMv92q3CGLbqhU5V482b2I/3Xiz1UMqxguv3rz/epKLj49G4nG1IOPi58zT+xbx/JN tMXEd27zBdPp3/Yub2+boOgtEPVx+utPew4bqCXsTWeK/3yWZ7129+MjCxhP/vqw4cmlicph DYt9lViKMxINtZiLihMBSo6Do3ACAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/uTXP4NbDI_VtrZ4A-AUV7rCZVLc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:42:00 -0000
The biggest problem with this approach is that it tends to work more for people who are good at winning arguments, using whatever tactics they choose, over those who are right - on those occasions when the two are not the same. Not all bright people are able to overcome an innate introversion to the extent that is required to be successful in a shouting match. And some of the brightest would rather see us flounder as a group while they take their arguments elsewhere. Just a thought... -- Eric -----Original Message----- From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Crocker Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 5:26 PM To: Michael StJohns; IETF Discussion Mailing List Subject: Re: discussion style and respect On 6/10/2015 9:40 PM, Michael StJohns wrote: > Through "consensus", we include things that are strongly presented, > vigorously defended, said by people with gravitas applicable to the > technology[, technically good], and not shouted down. It may be that > the style of interaction that you're complaining about is more related > to the "consensus" process than to any other element. If may be that > if you want to change the confrontational style, you're going to have > to change the way things become standards. In spite of formal voting, some other standards groups either explicitly or implicitly use a unanimity (not 'rough) consensus model. Still, they do not suffer anything approaching quantity of rude and disrespectful behavior that we tolerate and, arguably, condone. Adult, respectful behavior occurs when it is required. We don't require it. Not really. d/ ps. Periodic, generic -- albiet heartfelt -- pleas for better behavior might be necessary, but they have had no effect -- ever -- in almost 30 years. -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- discussion style and respect IETF Chair
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- RE: discussion style and respect Eric Gray
- RE: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Nico Williams
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- RE: discussion style and respect Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Harald Alvestrand
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Tim Chown
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Hector Santos
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Larry Masinter
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Jari Arkko
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John Leslie
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- Re: discussion style and respect jmh.direct
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Tobias Gondrom
- Re: discussion style and respect t.p.
- Re: discussion style and respect Dan Harkins