Re: discussion style and respect
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383061A89F1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uex-tSRjti3g for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com (mail-pa0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F7071A89D3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pablj1 with SMTP id lj1so4000045pab.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QlqnJHOHoSNauj1uGxxulbMd57gkpAri0uIstzfd7Fs=; b=ItehH8MfV5/+9RY8mNVQqp0e70LeAeKOVsAiQjevegazQvCc6HTf8slSmHUQeocKcC vbyY3xL0wPlstkxvqErDL5aoBdXGAQ2GGvQbz1vMcm739kO4KcAWNYE5EgGUB0jrUCt2 vr6X9HTWbRmPS0C5xMPvKMP05W0YEg0vk+dBg6DBdx6CBWBjDGsjD9M6T3h8pRMNDr56 PGeoG2n628/hmJySzkZBmVbqeRUIuaxvTmlUCTrX5iElhA0H5OwLN/P8TQkWSPakGnFt BHSN4urskLR/aIMbTtVEUYFsANX7oAq/ihPuk9z1m+65Wx37dBbCJDeR3WC06JdXD6IU I5/A==
X-Received: by 10.66.156.198 with SMTP id wg6mr17499257pab.126.1434055311290; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:6d8c:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:6d8c:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id cf1sm1546365pdb.41.2015.06.11.13.41.48 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:41:50 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5579F294.1080102@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 08:41:56 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com> <5578AB4F.3020406@dcrocker.net> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF632D561D2@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <20150610215800.867D91B2C4A@ietfa.amsl.com> <1798EE63-68EF-491F-A4EB-4B55ED0359EF@gmail.com> <55793DBB.9010508@cisco.com> <CAG4d1rdmbXZaUPCAbCdHaYqseXjs7c5yCyykvE9mi=5yNviL7Q@mail.gmail.com> <5579ECF0.4080708@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5579ECF0.4080708@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/bKEzFP_hEvPItEeAdkGnSp2zvrs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 20:41:53 -0000
On 12/06/2015 08:17, Melinda Shore wrote: > On 6/11/15 11:44 AM, Alia Atlas wrote: >> One aspect is to work on improving and discussing how to handle >> consensus issues for the WG Chairs. Anyone who hasn't read through >> RFC 7282 really should. In the Routing area, we've been having >> periodic Working Group chair training sessions. You can see the >> presentation and recording for the one we did "On Consensus" at: >> http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/WGChairTraining . > > These are really nice - might be useful as a basis for a > working group chairs training track. Right now there really > isn't such thing - the working group chairs training sessions > are useful and I think need to continue as is, but some sort > of training for new chairs seems valuable and might help us > avoid some of what's under discussion at the moment. There has been a "WG Leadership" tutorial from time to time in the past; in fact it ran at IETF92 (for the first time since IETF86): http://www.ietf.org/edu/process-oriented-tutorials.html#wgleadership One of the things we need to discuss at the EDUNEXT BOF is whether the traditional format of 90 minute tutorials on Sunday afternoon is still useful, and whether it should be supplemented or replaced by a suite of shorter videos and longer webinars that could be available any time, any place. Brian
- discussion style and respect IETF Chair
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- RE: discussion style and respect Eric Gray
- RE: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Nico Williams
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- RE: discussion style and respect Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Harald Alvestrand
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Tim Chown
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Hector Santos
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Larry Masinter
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Jari Arkko
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John Leslie
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- Re: discussion style and respect jmh.direct
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Tobias Gondrom
- Re: discussion style and respect t.p.
- Re: discussion style and respect Dan Harkins