Re: discussion style and respect
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 10 June 2015 23:05 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF3D1A8AA7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QxCSppAegD3Z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (ns.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8446F1B2C31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 16:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1Z2p3G-000MGu-Bs; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:04:54 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:04:49 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
Message-ID: <F56A33D90543E4A17CDC2875@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XVBDl8cNqfbDTYDXtSnyKnRCsLo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 23:05:07 -0000
--On Wednesday, June 10, 2015 16:40 -0400 Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> wrote: >... > Side comment - my thoughts on behavior. Almost every other > technical standards body in the world has voting at either the > individual, organization or country level with respect to > whether or not a particular element, thought, scheme or device > gets standardized. We do not. Through "consensus", we > include things that are strongly presented, vigorously > defended, said by people with gravitas applicable to the > technology[, technically good], and not shouted down. It may > be that the style of interaction that you're complaining >... Mike, An observation that is a little bit orthogonal to your remarks but that may also contribute enough to the behavior patterns people are noticing to be worth recording.... Almost every other technical standards body in the world also has an admissions and/or application procedure of some sort, usually including organizational or governmental endorsement of the applications and sign-off on the associated conditions. Those procedures are expected to guarantee a certain level of ability to simulate adult behavior as well as at least some minimal level of expertise in the subject matter. They also establish some level of accountability: if someone misbehaves, they can be kicked out (not merely, e.g., prevented from posting to a mailing list or three for a while) and, whether explicitly or merely by reputation, the sponsoring organizing can be negatively impacted. For better or worse, the IETF has no equivalent form of accountability, or mechanism (effective or not) for filtering to distinguish between people with knowledge and experience in a particular area and those who merely have strong opinions. In other bodies, the filtering arrangements tend to favor a certain level of orthodoxy in proposals and standards relative to introduction of new ideas. The IETF model of insisting that anyone can participate and that everyone who does participate does so strictly as an individual tends to avoid that orthodoxy and associated constraints but also avoids the advantages of enforceable rules, e.g., that one either behaves like an adult professional or gets out (or doesn't get in). I'm not persuaded that our model of reaching consensus is necessary to being open to innovative ideas, but there is almost certainly some interaction. At the same time, if we develop our own forms of orthodoxy (as we often seem to be doing of late) and enforce them through out decision-making processes, we end up with one of the major liabilities of most of those other standards bodies without the obvious advantages. best, john
- discussion style and respect IETF Chair
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- RE: discussion style and respect Eric Gray
- RE: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Nico Williams
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- RE: discussion style and respect Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Harald Alvestrand
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Tim Chown
- Re: discussion style and respect Yoav Nir
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect Hector Santos
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Eliot Lear
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Alia Atlas
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Larry Masinter
- Re: discussion style and respect Doug Royer
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- Re: discussion style and respect Jari Arkko
- Re: discussion style and respect Ted Lemon
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Michael StJohns
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John Leslie
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Dave Crocker
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect John C Klensin
- Re: discussion style and respect Brian E Carpenter
- Re: discussion style and respect Melinda Shore
- Re: discussion style and respect Joel M. Halpern
- Re: discussion style and respect Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- Re: discussion style and respect jmh.direct
- Re: discussion style and respect hallam
- RE: discussion style and respect Tony Hain
- Re: discussion style and respect Tobias Gondrom
- Re: discussion style and respect t.p.
- Re: discussion style and respect Dan Harkins