IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: discussion style and respect

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 05:03 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05E41A9096 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:03:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -12.612
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.612 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfNSlfHDs0kR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:03:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17E21A909C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 22:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1507; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1433998982; x=1435208582; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=Lweges4et7Wv54MHMtjC+RF0APSclZlR0MstoJTJMkk=; b=LAiJVW+e4zPZEtW0+Ke9xtX7Bogl/N3op0tIU/7eaLi2U40DNSeg4Ygz cVJbdJdbiDegge0o7SRMNyQOGEASl9RI3xdOLazf0731bbjVou083xcnM oFWUcGoK3ILL36wb1CtJ/EnMa9nShWodI7q7PRreH8pnFVJC2NZvYK1Y6 4=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 481
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CzBABjFXlV/xbLJq1ch2G6fYdbAoF2EgEBAQEBAQGBCoQjAQEBAyNVARALGAkWCwICCQMCAQIBRQYBDAEHAQGIK65ZpCsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGYtDhQYHgmiBRQEElWyBSodSiBOPbCSDejyCeAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,592,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="521052264"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jun 2015 05:03:01 +0000
Received: from [10.61.106.232] (dhcp-10-61-106-232.cisco.com [10.61.106.232]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t5B530nt021520; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:03:01 GMT
Message-ID: <55791687.9010002@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 07:03:03 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com> <5578AECF.5060400@joelhalpern.com> <07E866B5-49AC-403B-90D9-0025E5E18E4B@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <07E866B5-49AC-403B-90D9-0025E5E18E4B@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aCXRwiqppPBD45n8iTJbPbsh1FpOM2oMw"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/t0i98nHIxpV-_qtqvTMFPAy-IQM>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:03:07 -0000


On 6/11/15 5:49 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> Indeed, to the extent that people think shouting is the way to get
> things done here, that is an indication of brokenness, not of best
> practice.
It's not just shouting.  It's gaming and in some cases filibustering.  
Last year I was witness to one of the most shameful displays of
leadership I have ever seen involving both.  Chairs need to pick up on
that and act quickly to stop it.  In the case I witnessed it was
actually WORSE because the chairs interpreted the filibustering as a
change of consensus.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email