IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: discussion style and respect

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 11 June 2015 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3231A00EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.034
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.034 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qr91oh9ZNQS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AC31A0084 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F4527BC05D; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=TEZz03Zpz4laqX QQZ/+VyenYq5s=; b=fOj0blBj+ivM2e9PwS5L+NIkQi7FDfgfJ9kiUGSuiwjfMg BuV0kXAENRBDTPRcYkrRV4pPO9PIIh/hMv3mGA1KMgZQTsFfsbHfx+8Ynm31DwxC +rZwo2ABgMvsbKCfW9M4WmmMinct+YSawgnqj1pl25w3HGP2jUw7lNPapwfnc=
Received: from localhost (unknown [172.56.18.136]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a67.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7A68027BC056; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 19:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:52:48 -0500
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: discussion style and respect
Message-ID: <20150611025247.GA4007@localhost>
References: <3BF40BF3-B7EB-4571-BD7B-D394D4F0CB6C@ietf.org> <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150610204037.6837A1ACD25@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/NS66IstWhafunfQMfNf8g65f8EI>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 02:52:52 -0000

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 04:40:38PM -0400, Michael StJohns wrote:
>                                                [...].   If may be that
> if you want to change the confrontational style, you're going to have
> to change the way things become standards.  [...]

Adversarial good, confrontational bad.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email