IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com> Fri, 10 September 2004 15:49 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08284; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5nj6-00011Q-7S; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:54:16 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5nQe-0003bx-OK; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:35:12 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5nHY-0001HF-UD for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:25:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06080 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:25:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5nLc-0000ND-Nr for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:30:03 -0400
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Sep 2004 08:25:44 -0700
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from mira-sjc5-a.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-a.cisco.com [171.71.163.34]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8AFP8xo016407 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cisco.com (che-vpn-cluster-1-62.cisco.com [10.86.240.62]) by mira-sjc5-a.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with SMTP id ATU35797; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by cisco.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:18:06 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:18:06 -0400
From: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20040910151806.GP3172@sbrim-w2k01>
Mail-Followup-To: Scott W Brim <sbrim@cisco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20040910133022.46082861D6@newdev.harvard.edu> <OLEPILDGDKGAPONGCBEOEEDECIAA.cdel@firsthand.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <OLEPILDGDKGAPONGCBEOEEDECIAA.cdel@firsthand.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 01485d64dfa90b45a74269b3ca9d5574
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009

Drafts are as important as RFCs in demonstrating prior art against silly
patents.  De facto we, as a community, already depend on being able to
find old drafts to defend ourselves.  

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email