IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....

"Christian de Larrinaga" <cdel@firsthand.net> Fri, 10 September 2004 14:31 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA01164; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5mUi-0007dw-Mk; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:35:22 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5mBN-0002Tp-NZ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:15:21 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5m63-0000FY-HQ for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:09:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA28462 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.54]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5mA4-0007Ab-CC for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 10:14:04 -0400
Received: from pcgz600re (foxcombe.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.215.107]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D56256761; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:09:42 +0100 (BST)
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
To: scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, harald@alvestrand.no, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:12:45 +0100
Message-ID: <OLEPILDGDKGAPONGCBEOEEDECIAA.cdel@firsthand.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-Reply-To: <20040910133022.46082861D6@newdev.harvard.edu>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e5ba305d0e64821bf3d8bc5d3bb07228
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

How about prior art? Am I wrong to think of expiry dates as only relating to
currency to Standards process rather than to the broader record?

Following on from that does the expiry indicate that the copyright reverts
back from ISOC to the authors? I hadn't expected that to be the case.

Christian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> scott bradner
> Sent: 10 September 2004 14:30
> To: harald@alvestrand.no; ietf@ietf.org; sob@harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
>
>
> the last time we talked about this Jorge said that he saw no problem
> (legally) to just offer a takedown process to anyone who felt that
> they did not want their ID to last longer than N days
>
> but, to me, its quite silly to pretend that IDs actually disapear
> from the net just because teh IETF takes it off of our web site
>
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email