Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Sun, 12 September 2004 00:44 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23618; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:44:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6IYT-0002aY-6R; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:49:22 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6IRZ-0003oJ-S7; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:42:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6IQY-0003Ug-GS for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:41:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA23417 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:41:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6IUv-0002XF-6n for ietf@ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:45:42 -0400
Received: from [128.9.160.144] (nib.isi.edu [128.9.160.144]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i8C0eGJ07752; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <41439AE7.6030703@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:40:07 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@mcsr-labs.org>
References: <66EDBDB3-0331-11D9-B4E7-000A95E35274@cisco.com> <050a01c497f6$567e4000$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
In-Reply-To: <050a01c497f6$567e4000$0400a8c0@DFNJGL21>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-ISI-4-30-3-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0885331360=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a


Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> Dear Harald-the-General-AD,
> 
> Can we PLEASE do as Melinda says - change the policy now for new drafts? 

That may have a chilling effect on new drafts. I.e., this isn't as 
simple as "let's just change it now for future stuff".

IMO, changing the policy would indeed be "making the problem worse".

At least, unless there's an explicit opt-out (preferably an opt-in, 
though) that __does not affect the ability of an ID to be a WG document 
or be otherwise affected by procedure___.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf