IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Sun, 12 September 2004 22:01 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA14477; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:01:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6cUT-0000ZU-1o; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:06:33 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6cLh-0007T9-JH; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:57:29 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6cKe-0007K2-NN for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:56:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA14186 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:56:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] helo=sj-iport-2.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6cPD-0000Tg-3O for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 18:01:08 -0400
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (171.71.177.237) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2004 15:04:31 -0700
Received: from mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com [171.71.163.17]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8CLtosg027892; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:55:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cisco.com ([10.25.65.178]) by mira-sjc5-c.cisco.com (MOS 3.4.5-GR) with SMTP id AYY01738; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 14:55:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 17:55:23 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553)
To: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4144AB59.3020303@isi.edu>
Message-Id: <72911B66-0506-11D9-B4E7-000A95E35274@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sunday, September 12, 2004, at 04:02 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> It's still unclear - the document contains required wording about its 
> expiration, under the same document. The two statements are in 
> conflict in that regard.

I have some problems with retroactively changing agreements, but
your concern here is lost on me.  Email, private correspondence, offline
discussions, and all sorts of things are referable.  You can't
stop people from referring to documents whether they're expired
or not, public or not, etc.

Melinda


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email