RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....

"Christian de Larrinaga" <cdel@firsthand.net> Fri, 10 September 2004 16:56 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA13065; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:56:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5olq-0002R7-Mk; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:01:11 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5oPw-0002Z9-1p; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:38:32 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C5oIp-0008SE-JT for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:31:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA10965 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:31:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.54]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5oMu-0001rS-Sa for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:35:26 -0400
Received: from pcgz600re (foxcombe.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.215.107]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703EE25F40E; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:31:01 +0100 (BST)
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
To: scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, harald@alvestrand.no, ietf@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 17:34:04 +0100
Message-ID: <OLEPILDGDKGAPONGCBEOKEDLCIAA.cdel@firsthand.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-Reply-To: <20040910143425.44CAE86464@newdev.harvard.edu>
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


scott bradner 10 September 2004 15:34
>
> > Following on from that does the expiry indicate that the
> copyright reverts
> > back from ISOC to the authors? I hadn't expected that to be the case.
>
> note that the only rights that the ISOC has for IDs is to publish
> them and to make derivative works (unless they are marked so as to
> not allow derivative works) the autor retains all other rights
>
> the granting (not transfer) of the publication and derivative rights
> does not end if the ID gets removed from the IETF public ID directory
>
> Scott
>

So nothing to stop publication (by ISOC) of ID's in their original format or
if not explicitly disallowed in a compendium or other publication at
anytime.

Christian


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf