IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Sun, 12 September 2004 20:19 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA09537; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:19:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6atQ-0007WK-7s; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:24:13 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6afh-00014L-Tb; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:10:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6abs-0007rh-JS for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:06:04 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA08859 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:06:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6agN-0007LN-RX for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 16:10:47 -0400
Received: from [128.9.168.55] (upn.isi.edu [128.9.168.55]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i8CK4YJ24406; Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4144AB59.3020303@isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 13:02:33 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA0AEC0B00@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA0AEC0B00@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
X-ISI-4-30-3-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1302654049=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 6cca30437e2d04f45110f2ff8dc1b1d5


Christian Huitema wrote:
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> 
> Of
> 
>>Joe Touch
>>Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:42 AM
>>To: Kai Henningsen
>>Cc: ietf@ietf.org
>>Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
>>
>>
>>
>>Kai Henningsen wrote:
> 
> Joe,
> 
> You mention a potential chilling effect an authors if the IETF
> maintained an archive of past drafts, but the text in RFC 2026 is pretty
> clear. Check the paragraph #1 in section 10.3.1. It says "the
> contributor ... grant an unlimited perpetual, non-exclusive,
> royalty-free, world-wide right and license to the ISOC and the IETF
> under any copyrights in the contribution." Note the words "unlimited
> perpetual" -- definitely not "limited to 6 months". 
> 
> -- Christian Huitema 

It's still unclear - the document contains required wording about its 
expiration, under the same document. The two statements are in conflict 
in that regard.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email