Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Mon, 13 September 2004 21:44 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16204; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:44:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6yhK-0004v8-Px; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:49:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6yCK-00006G-KR; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:17:16 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C6xN6-0004xj-C1 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:24:20 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA03896 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6xRo-0000oB-Ne for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:29:16 -0400
Received: from ewe.isi.edu (ewe.isi.edu [128.9.160.219]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i8DKLjJ14747; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20040913130620.02e34200@boreas.isi.edu>
X-Sender: braden@boreas.isi.edu (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:18:30 -0700
To: kaih@khms.westfalen.de, ietf@ietf.org
From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <9GoXY5mXw-B@khms.westfalen.de>
References: <41448A64.2090300@isi.edu> <66EDBDB3-0331-11D9-B4E7-000A95E35274@cisco.com> <41439AE7.6030703@isi.edu> <9GjynSJXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <9GjynSJXw-B@khms.westfalen.de> <41448A64.2090300@isi.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-ISI-4-30-3-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: braden@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca
> > > > I have yet to see a coherent argument for keeping the ID series if it's > > archived publicly. Why do we need to see the entire process - in public > > - of editing and revision? And if we do, why do we need two separate > > series to do this? > >It's not a document series, it's preserving history - exactly the same way >that the mailing list archives do, using the exact same arguments. (And >incidentally, the exact same situation wrt. "getting published".) > >If you argue that you want to abolish the mailing list archives, I think >you'll find strong opposition; I certainly do not see why the I-D >situation is any different. > >MfG Kai This "preserving history" notion is an obfuscation. If there is a stable reference to each particular I-D, then the set of I-Ds with those stable references necessarily form an archival document series. The Original Intent of the IETF founding fathers was that the RFCs should form the stable, archival document series for the Internet technology, containing its entire intellectual history (to use Scott's term), while I-Ds were to be ephemeral. This is analogous to academic publication; we archive only the finished papers, not the 17 drafts that go into the production of each paper. Publication in a conference or journal is a filter that keeps us from hopelessly garbaging up the intellectual record. The FFs believed that preserving I-Ds would lead to such a garbage pile with piles of chaff for every grain of wheat. Of course, the IETF has drifted far away from this OI. But then, you knew all that. Bob Braden _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- archives (was The other parts of the report.... scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Stewart Bryant
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Pekka Savola
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… John C Klensin
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bob Braden
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Eric Rosen
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Steve Crocker
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Vernon Schryver
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen