Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

[Bill Manning <[e-mail]>]

% 
% Bill - as I said in a previous posting - it would be quite fine
% for you to say 'IETF- you do not have permission to post my expired ID' 
% and the IETF should then remove your ID from the IETF's public archive
% but just because you might want to do that shoudl not (imo) keep the
% IETF from posting the 40,000 or so IDs from others, most of whom I
% expect would not object
% 
% 
% Scott

	perhaps true.
	but retro-actively changing the term of a contract,
	esp when no such escape clause was in effect at the
	time the contract was in force, is fraught w/ potential
	liabilities.
	
	not saying it could not happen, just that not all that
	sure of the value proposition of this particular line
	item makes it worthwhile going after the collective
	at this time.  

	it would be worth some cycles to modify the BP used
	to indicate, for the general case, that ISOC or its duly
	authorized agents(blablabla) reserves the right to maintain
	any ID published with this clause intact in the ISOC archives.

	as usual, ymmv.

--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf