Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com> Tue, 14 September 2004 15:14 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA17279; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7F5e-0008He-KB; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:19:31 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7En3-0003d3-Mn; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 11:00:17 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C7Ed2-0001YS-8g for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:49:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA15741 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C7Ehw-0007pv-L9 for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:55:01 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (64.102.124.13) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2004 10:49:22 -0400
X-BrightmailFiltered: true
Received: from cisco.com (erosen-u10.cisco.com [161.44.70.36]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8EEnJH7015772; Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:49:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200409141449.i8EEnJH7015772@rtp-core-2.cisco.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 13 Sep 2004 15:02:44 -0700. <Pine.HPX.4.58.0409131450280.22167@wells.cisco.com>
User-Agent: EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (Unebigoryōmae) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 10:49:19 -0400
From: Eric Rosen <erosen@cisco.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: erosen@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
I've never thought that the IETF was OBLIGATED to "hide" old I-Ds; that seems a rather far-fetched interpretation of anything in RFC 2026. However, I think there is a real practical problem in making the old i-d's be too readily available. I frequently get messages asking me questions like "where is draft-rosen-something-or-other-04.txt, I can't find it" to which the answer is one of the following: a. you want draft-rosen-something-or-other-23.txt, or b. you want draft-ietf-somewg-something-or-other-05.txt, or c. you want RFC 12345. What's happened is that they have found some email which references a long outdated draft, and have no clue how to get to the most up-to-date version, which is what they really want to see. If we make it too easy to access the old drafts, a lot of people will just get the old drafts instead of being forced to look for the more recent work. Sure, people who really want to see the old drafts should be able to get them, but people who really want to see the most up-to-date versions shouldn't get the old drafts just because they only know an old draft name. In a perfect system, someone would go to the IETF's official I-D page, enter a draft name, and get a prominent pointer to the most recent version (even if it is now an RFC or a draft with a different name), along with a less prominent pointer to the thing they actually asked for. If that can't be done, it might be better to keep the expired drafts "officially hidden". Not for the reasons being given by our more academically inclined colleagues, but for the practical reasons described above. Sure, the expired drafts might be obtainable via Google, but getting something from Google is a bit different than getting it via the IETF's official web page. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- archives (was The other parts of the report.... scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Stewart Bryant
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Pekka Savola
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… John C Klensin
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Carl Malamud
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… scott bradner
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Christian Huitema
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Melinda Shore
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bill Manning
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Joe Touch
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Bob Braden
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Eric Rosen
- RE: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Steve Crocker
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Scott W Brim
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Vernon Schryver
- Re: archives (was The other parts of the report..… Kai Henningsen