Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Tue, 20 January 2015 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2E51ACE1D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.277
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.277 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5faU7xWUOSRE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C2AA1A90A8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f46.google.com with SMTP id s18so11057441lam.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=M+oYto9tL/4S2EpvHjGF1yorWEB02FX4KTvfSpbxTsY=; b=zrNAVBEbUabh3jz/2RBITwfBttZkRBPjpBteK9T7dkJ7FbU9cTBlOEfK4lPXE5P6l5 Uazc9Dn0IWpHAFRa+vM/NabQMVgZ1m/L+GZJNWZMrMfqAcG2k5TmpodZPe4AP/1mFHHU 0K557LLnUGE8pp43rrMaDG8VxZ4X2LhF/IIFR8WbDCRch48ebqdZv50mAISHDC1OVF6F ztNxMwvu7ZW30s7owbOmYtmXNJAsYDZ7bA5+3Dj0gkB1ajh9XW1V2D6hT8bd/sXbFCL4 livB47HcW5X6WL3Wq6U2vNpddM/5ZFAGTar5yhx0u0HEGXRvkfc8zPH0SaFgUpM6yBGu 87iQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.28.194 with SMTP id d2mr35649352lah.85.1421722501108; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:01 -0800 (PST)
Sender: hallam@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.19.42 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 18:55:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAHbuEH5SONtcY2ENQ8rdqqYJ01YVFFU+1+UR9W3R++eYxmGhjQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ED473823-2B1E-4431-8B42-393D20BA72DF@piuha.net> <54AC505B.8090802@nostrum.com> <8EFCB6B4-0D95-459E-A316-DB29C3945A33@cooperw.in> <DM2PR0201MB09604D5A8DBF0D315E6DA7BAC34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <33740FEA-AEA1-4933-A17C-50B92C7619F0@gmail.com> <DM2PR0201MB0960F339E10E51FD0153DDF4C34A0@DM2PR0201MB0960.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <CAHbuEH5SONtcY2ENQ8rdqqYJ01YVFFU+1+UR9W3R++eYxmGhjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:55:00 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5cwYF4c3ajM2OaiCtaR7Gya6Ba4
Message-ID: <CAMm+LwhAMRKLZ7HyM-1pq5mENNDxEfvYGo0e+WwVZ-wd60qguw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF areas re-organisation steps
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
To: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b420a5d903050d0c90b4
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/HeR9g8MVkqOqbStGFDbawe5wmic>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 02:55:04 -0000

Before we go too far with this, it just occurred to me that implicit in the
discussion to date has been the notion that an AD spends most of their time
managing WGs.

That might be the case for some areas but there are others where there is a
huge amount of out of area work. Security for example.