IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)

"Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com> Fri, 06 December 2013 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E411ADFE2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:44:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 940W1aNHCkKs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DED21ADF10 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 06:44:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1174; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1386341043; x=1387550643; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=vc2cpyTuQZuMA9E2YnJuerwaxqimtsoQxBhxgPvTmsU=; b=LQ2t5wXWO6jmJaYrH89SFtFO+Ks38SeX0HvsmZnsGSaYp51qLFvMlXGy qbi4B17MXczAOkrwBVC1+aewhYC/B2iyuVthBKi9hT3ENGBTfhLWtPLui Kc+58oNWmE44VDy0sUWDzW5iZsRhXa3tm1fqgp7LHnQOk03WcuYvvK0MO Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhIFAMPhoVKtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgweBC7kAgSEWdIIlAQEBAwF0CgsCAQhGMiUCBBOHfAbBEReOXTqDIIETA4kKjwqSE4Mpgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,841,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="286835763"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2013 14:44:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com [173.36.12.76]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB6Ei2pi032250 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:44:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.231]) by xhc-aln-x02.cisco.com ([173.36.12.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:44:01 -0600
From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" <fluffy@cisco.com>
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)
Thread-Topic: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)
Thread-Index: AQHO8pGZwJt98adXJUWIx5StIgHePw==
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:44:01 +0000
Message-ID: <C9771BCD-FA24-489D-9681-158C84A7F51F@cisco.com>
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl> <52974AA8.6080702@cisco.com> <CAKFn1SHMBG=Rwq8SNJkPz6EUD9O9P+0gTD569_5eXc7ndBpYRQ@mail.gmail.com> <529A0A4A.1040107@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMB44JYj-hkp_O72f2yg-OtBuyqN=NC3aW2PBvh7ZO-kBw@mail.gmail.com> <529BC7B1.8070205@gmail.com> <CA+9kkMBJ7mktXepDckaOTBcP3wZ4e-MM7cmu_=RFJymKNr5xuA@mail.gmail.com> <12721589-7B67-49C9-99E5-CBE96BE45F11@standardstrack.com> <CABmDk8kxED6bvrGoHCcsXCEhpa3-qQL_ZQO8xmUBV1Kt96ELjA@mail.gmail.com> <529EF265.5000808@stpeter.im> <529EF3C2.9000303@ericsson.com> <CAL02cgT6nT4F4P3Nk=s9vQTX5ge4AaZWCCno1RvCSyF5sEMA8Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL02cgT6nT4F4P3Nk=s9vQTX5ge4AaZWCCno1RvCSyF5sEMA8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <90CE6A1AD31D774FAD65205D82F68F69@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 14:44:08 -0000

On Dec 4, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:

> Gonzalo has captured this accurately.  We have been keeping in touch with the folks that had been driving things, back at the BoF stage.  Currently, my understanding is that things are in a holding pattern.  
> 
> Of course, if there's someone else who wants to take the lead on moving a charter forward (and probably having a second BoF), please feel free to contact Gonzalo or me. 
> 

And also ask the folks the Google folks that did VP8 if they are willing to do a video codec at IETF (currently Google is pursing standardization at MPEG which would be a good thing for VP8) and if they will give IETF change control. (AFAIC the answer when last asked was No). Ditto for the folks that did H.265. (Again AFAIC, answer is No). In the meantime, if you want to actually contribute to the research of figuring out how to design an IPR free video codec, go help the Daala guys. It's an excellent project at an early research stage and so far is the only concrete proposal that has been put forward of what might form input to an IETF video codec WG.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email