IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Thu, 28 November 2013 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552071AE004 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.078
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.078 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b30d4ZUGC2mC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFCA1ADF65 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id uz6so8774707obc.23 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SguFAHxu9xle3YBQAHf1k/YINh02T2NLMtJ8ADA63Hs=; b=SkbMq3pfHxrWwr4/39b7yEa/MNZo501PT1q8X7Xv89YNvvBhwsSWTgEQhwoAvMg6/G VqyPmZlpe+2x7uJnLCGznKQs8sUZK138lBvdABqelQhQgxb1qFFYKe1d99JwxIGSUVtF DpZ2OF/U3dGI2h8PvCPmzyt3bv6o2ZDhPd7X4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SguFAHxu9xle3YBQAHf1k/YINh02T2NLMtJ8ADA63Hs=; b=NjOJ2ihG/pwohS0bG2b3PWgKItP7YNewDjuLPPUTVgveJpP25cMnXgvqFvxqsIxKC3 8DtIaptFvkz7UFIIo4wf7+TD0l3ksv0zgEmi2KnspTZlAGQxjMjaWcq0Png74CAHG3rv aU5XsJb1yJZ1Efh3L8ED5TLRXij7mcJGRnpPlOaeMCsK0M2YyJiovEoW5KrX1+TtIsqz TTCsNT/Epp20FWFuT16R4sOeHNYfBNGD5lTz4yiA2yPc0tqRT2muEgTFjqZ66A4SOg9+ S+JNzzUhFebwZyBxPRnujd4f5y/TtxoFMKuDaF9qaQMn35VJSySFNIHsMVA3+bGrdRis UHcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBvMJ96bK6QqaPJ+sAT8JNSRNZvX15RUYy2cCuS9c43oK82kiYeYK+nA4NvZL9LSaySiXV
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.80.196 with SMTP id t4mr38881224obx.1.1385648672090; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.121.97 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 06:24:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl>
References: <DUB127-W23531D0E8B15570331DB51E0EE0@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:24:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKHUCzyv=h9-YhS0Qq0bTy-jFxh4CE+x9qMrEj_PSd-z8VYrxA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Hervé <h_o_w_@hotmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e4edae2407e04ec3d7883"
Cc: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 14:24:34 -0000

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Hervé <h_o_w_@hotmail.com> wrote:

> No decision yet. Per
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/current/msg09909.html today
> is the last planned day for comment/discussion on the _proposal_ to vote,
> before the proposal gets updated. A further call for consensus to use
> the proposal would follow after updating.
> Perhaps you'd like to get involved now rather than later.
>

I am involved now, and in the correct venue for discussions about changing
IETF process.

Dave.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email