IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 09 June 2017 06:53 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98DFC126C25 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ODVMjY4xAEhI for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 23:53:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58D11242F7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 23:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id p62so25037776vkp.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 23:53:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XWXcnC7HBij8jxipZsoHDkZQD2rOlkfe4Z1l3TfrPq0=; b=iKakamaHi2ZgrZNwb+8Xlq+xM1G0uVGrMpBlsk9+EQ3oQcW58TT+5fL4rQfnZlMMvi MYwNFzdoR+JMD4xmG+YChrzDyQlvVcyzDGm3b6yauzsHdRf1NP0udOEDStGoK6muwZu3 kQfeslNwBoPqK1JcCcqL5QuANlQXslEk/uRFzt+alkIBs6oMwHrB7K96eD/9+9rnJ/pw /lf83tpao+uALZ518vjjkZ+KxsB2D5yKgptt4Jptw9WWGYqo9w2XpiJ/7dCDj8mOXZd/ pXaM/RykkiNgc0oIkL61GbdDItxDYa+kV8S7pfBdTxs9nuLJu4sABzJKELrCoXKIeGbF Oiqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XWXcnC7HBij8jxipZsoHDkZQD2rOlkfe4Z1l3TfrPq0=; b=P7Iwm+EFVDqNmyHeafaDycgBLf5MTpv5Sw3+v+lPUy30vpnlAC6vhMKh4XewKIyG7o oBYtl/rxRpGl3erxphfxNx4hMJBVP6NIKAS0xzbyIKPQcmH+Po5+algzghIDWLL1vUm0 h1koMXpD3igyA13CInTfLx1HmXGiB+2FPkRS2cz5yoTvxrurIfPD7u6dz0qIhUixIfgd 1LSGaEcJ2Y21nldD/dozok52+23kq8cCu9c7OJqhDoa7ZBqqSQ9M28Y7BmGuhlDgUPc4 cYJ1/QXdnqGmp43pSXuAvF7S3mkcVr6YQoB9JE6lgrNiHpXgZ2j3Zc1Jg3S1fBkjwXfc CO/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCRN8fKzJ8xNlJcBeObmJJ2DaFWDdlFXv6x+deQoU6dIih3edi9 9vzTNh0OO9wOsnF65FY1VEQFjQFCkbCLHdo=
X-Received: by 10.31.210.1 with SMTP id j1mr20246250vkg.144.1496991214867; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 23:53:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.12.139 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 23:53:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <B3BBA297-88ED-4BD4-A02C-213EE554FECC@google.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com> <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com> <CAKD1Yr3+pHFhCwoL4vbQLDQ3PNGpijci8c7eZM=Gb0oTy9C0XA@mail.gmail.com> <8678F73D-2CCD-4781-9947-8C07182DFAF4@google.com> <CAKD1Yr2upJBU9Arrg1TnkOKtshZ_MsWfJs_SXWrO4YV4NAA8ag@mail.gmail.com> <B3BBA297-88ED-4BD4-A02C-213EE554FECC@google.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 15:53:13 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr02QDDAm0kk+fXYDRWqdf=M-iTJw5OtawBjMjWGuvXetA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
To: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114bc9e2988ae70551816d77"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/2PT7dzqGj4G5hcjYVaP0lrZRz4g>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 06:53:38 -0000

On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 2:25 AM, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> wrote:

> If thread doesn't use RFC 4861, then it probably uses address
> registration? If so it's trivia[...]
>
>
> It does not. The problem is not trivial.
>
> You're invited to have a look at the Thread 1.1 mesh protocol. If you
> think you can devise a power conservative method for making a Thread 1.1
> border router efficiently join a home Wi-fi network using IPv6 Neighbor
> Discovery, then I'm sure the Thread engineering team would be happy to
> consider your ideas.
>

Is it publicly documented? If not, I'd be happy to sit down with you and
debate this :-)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email