IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)

james woodyatt <jhw@google.com> Tue, 06 June 2017 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD1B1275AB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gkm2L1CyL115 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B50C127241 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 12:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a70so30531394pge.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=N9KwQhwgsburgBVAY5Q6CSE7kqs5Vw29POU1+AZHZc0=; b=JJi7F9i7EEDkANQrVSdMf3kiF4o3Lu0cZHiT7OEbcyR6p0yUCjIjG4YVa+qwik9ano KRYlUXiuwkamHsXAmHGYytyxCRZGzAHCe6mLB0iWhEhPGIxw/3Bn3lgEVLkcR1Ougmj+ VEsR2+F4UUOQDuelrIpmnNLDoxpBSO6kI0SJawpiCTW+TNL+PCZny0yBFtQRK+c8ySQu nCneSL0xJaRJbN89Mk65T3t0MCPlfQKEAhCFDshhn76rq59azck2RLXwSolFPnfA/HzY UYzNIKrSOgNU0ilXFHaBChXi2v+sFpD0/qPNx4LtfY7DB1ccwQKBVxezYQT9loSGTeMi Fb3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=N9KwQhwgsburgBVAY5Q6CSE7kqs5Vw29POU1+AZHZc0=; b=YRJqAMS7gMSbriGgmTQyRTdans864VPFqjlIP3GzRGl0nD69e+zIU9f9r40O5puAJN RskLomYusRpdULBJUpAXwqOtkBw3CF0cmhKJO1Xzbj7MIdRbEZ2gsUhJXWqVqE79lV1N aK66TKD2b+5IkL7aEAkeSps6Yi3/LXlDbBYYOg+DQUsjP2WHOHcoVoccSZomfEJXGTB9 Y0uz1xAFBnbkibU8OZQD82aQYRoPMVag6/Z1vwkLdfEfYfNovNHii6B19lpGB2ErSfwR FZQFrSM8qSF1JIy3FYK34LsczcsxDZJgLRXnrM0IR05OPHKrAd5Tci1w8mGaxqJXSo5L ikgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCNp+7ARWzeDz4dRr8LjFFw/qZPJz7NPygO6QmgPwrKIBoA6Zvz +ggmdqKlKGmNFh9J
X-Received: by 10.99.165.78 with SMTP id r14mr6731396pgu.74.1496775941516; Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2620::10e7:10:b852:7159:721:8e69? ([2620:0:10e7:10:b852:7159:721:8e69]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm65411094pfk.120.2017.06.06.12.05.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: james woodyatt <jhw@google.com>
Message-Id: <93C6138E-A2EE-4005-8C16-05E2A2DEA661@google.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_FE7CC3BE-0D52-463D-8606-1EEE4F486AE3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: Deprecating IPv6 (Re: draft-bourbaki-6man-classless-ipv6-00)
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 12:06:02 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Erik Kline <ek@google.com>
References: <CAO42Z2wp72j-yOsR8C=iqS+dX14wLwthAtOTvD5ugj_NQ=NQag@mail.gmail.com> <8be34ef8-557f-652e-0d2f-f1a1e008bffd@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1706050827290.17963@uplift.swm.pp.se> <E2B77C58-B235-49D6-8130-0B41BE55899C@google.com> <CAAedzxrkbywKMmUaZ6-OCunXe1sw=q3+TNz278xZDmdsQm3xaw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_MgLlaPSQls0O1YGSy1aViQOsjg>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 19:05:43 -0000

On Jun 5, 2017, at 20:57, Erik Kline <ek@google.com> wrote:
> On 6 June 2017 at 03:47, james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>> wrote:
> 
> Now is as good a time as any to repeat that I’m working on delivering *basically* this now. Not in ten years. Now. […]We are already on the path to IPv6/NAT w/ address amplification. We had a chance to stop it, and we blew it. It’s time to move on from that mistake.
> 
> Consider ND proxy or application/CoAP proxying.

p1. Power conservative ND Proxy isn’t possible with Thread™ 1.1 (and earlier) networks. It may never be possible in future versions of Thread™.

p2. Thread™ is not an application layer. It is an IPv6 mesh network layer. There is no single application layer to proxy.

The war against IPv6/NAT is over. It’s time to go home and nurse our wounds.


--james woodyatt <jhw@google.com <mailto:jhw@google.com>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email